Stalingrad

you see boy, it's the same with Poland, we took our land back, there was no backstabbing
and don't tell me about "germany releasing Poland, they wanted to have a puppet state which would get annexed sooner or later

Neat. Thanks for the insight.

This is my favorite show on Hitler's lack of mlitary prowess:

youtu.be/dueGnewPbFQ

He had a brilliant team but thought as a corporal he could make better decisions. While WW2 was a horrible waste by any measure, it really showed that humans cannot handle autocracy, and need democracy and a requirement to see leaders as fallible and replaceable.

most of armies and supplies were sent to eastern front mongol

>fighting capabilities of the USSR
They were shit fighters, the Kill to death ratio will attest to that. The Soviets simply shoveled massive amounts of men and material into the German meatgrinder until the meatgrinder broke.

That's what they did. Half of the German army was roided women.

By 1945 over 40% of German land forces fought against the West, and most of the Luftwaffe fought against the west for the whole war.

Gdansk wasn't founded by germans and it was majority german thanks to teutons massacring polish population
but well I guess it's too hard to read wiki
> It is generally thought that Mieszko I of Poland erected a stronghold on the site in the 980s, thereby connecting the Polish state ruled by the Piast dynasty with the trade routes of the Baltic Sea

Leningrad would have been a better target do to its ports and connection with Finland.

Axis armies have lost urban combat and this allowed to encircle them.

Also communists that made purges in army before war stepped down and allowed generals to lead the war.

>They did not have the supply capabilities to keep the very stretched front lines at operational effectiveness for long
No, that problems were in the Red Army too. Wermacht was able to quikly move their forces lengthwise line of a front.