European Federation

What's so bad about this?

the corrupt leadership that wants to drown us in niggers

The manner and the system its adopting to facilitate federalization

finland and sweden looking like a big penis over europe,if norway would join it would be better because it would change shape

Literally nothing

why norway and iceland is not in it

because they're smart

Because Iceland is island and Norway has oil.

>Romania
Why the fuck are you complaining, we're dragging you out of the mud.

>we

Yes, WE. Lithuania is sending you money too.

Britannia is not part of the usa

Idea good, implementation bad

Because the european nations especially on the east were made because of ethnic nationalism, and EU would be against that it would mix various races and such thing as a real Lithuanian would seize to exist one day no paper will make an african european

In theory, nothing, but it doesn't work out like that in practice.

>*increasingly concerned writing*

a giant bureucratic and corrupt monster that want to regulate and tax every fucking thing with the minimum check and balances

>corrupt
I always keep hearing this, but it can't be more corrupt than our government. Whenever I hear about EU related corruption, it's always at the local level about some politician witholding funds or something like that.
The factors that threaten our culture will be there with or without the EU. It's how we deal with them locally.

>independent Lithuania would have as big problem being Lithuanian as it would in EU Federation

We're not going to shut our borders like the Norks one way or another. And the 1000 refugees assigned to Lithuania won't bring about the end of our nation. Besides, no one wants to move here.

>no one from africa would ever move to a quickly developing nation that is in 10 years will be as good to live as western europe is now

nothing wrong with it. it is inevitable that Germany, Europe's most dynamic economic and cultural power, unshielded by natural barriers; they will exert influence and control over their periphery. The Germans must take over Europe every time they are united, whether they want to or not. The EU/U.S.E. is a good thing, because thankfully it's an actually peaceful way for them to do this, and they are just the leaders with slightly more influence, not the rulers controlling everything.

>THIS

YEEEEAAAAHÖÖÖÖÖ

This would work and europe would become the world powerhouse it once was again, but only if we sterilize non-finns

>What's so bad about this?
This:

Nothing
If you're German

>muh cultural extinction

suck it up, your ancestor persevered against hundreds of years of germano/russo/polish cultural opression, I'm sure you can handle 20 somalis.

he's talking about youths migrating to the west and low birth rates, i think.

>What's so bad about this?
Look at our history. You'll all eventually have to confirm to the larger nations will and morals.

>no paper will make an african european
>EU would be against that it would mix various races

I think he's talking about something else.
At any rate, low birth rates aren't really the fault of EU.

Not the eu per se but its consumerist, market driven ideals.
how do you deal with a shortage of workers/consumers and stay at positive growth? Import people who in turn may possibly replace the natives.

Premature membership to countries whose poor citizens use the roads built for commerce to go on begging and theft excursions. It's taking to long to fix the problem in some way. I hate the EU, it seemed fun and exciting 10-15 years ago but reality is as bleak as always.

How longer will it take before the whole damned thing collapses?

> 7.5 billion of peepholes on the planet
> WE NEED TO BREED AND SHIET

In the context of existential threat it is an issue. If we're talking about pure numbers it isn't.

The leadership would presumably be different since all the positions from national governments would have to move up.

>European Federation
>there's an independent country in the middle

failed federation

t. Vaslui town rapist

very unaesthetic borders

Being in the same country as Germ*ns and Angl*s.

> t. frog

It's actually quite an insidious concept. Birth rates are very much tied to the education and personal freedom of people, especially women.
There's also quite a big correlation with temporal financial stability (just look at europe's birth rates post 2008 or EE's birthrates in the 90s).

These are all areas where the EU is actually a beneficial party to the host nation, through financial subsidies, various educational incentives and programmes, human rights tribunals, etc.

And this is the ironic part, in order to avert the percieved national existential crysis, a country would need to go on a program of repression, witholding education and personal freedoms to its citizens. That or get them really rich, really fast, but we all know how realistic that is...

But anyway, Lithuanian fertility rate is on the rise ever since joining the EU, the bigger problem is emigration.

Natalist policies.

Corrupt politicians are scared of competition on their turfs.