Ruh Roh

nytimes.com/interactive/2016/upshot/presidential-polls-forecast.html?_r=0

Other urls found in this thread:

peoplespunditdaily.com/latest-polls/election-2016/us-presidential-election-daily-tracking-poll/
youtube.com/watch?v=CiJYGV8faZw
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

That's good, I stand with her.

Oh, thanks for the heads up Jews. Keep me posted.

>So there's no need for me to go vote since she's clearly going to win :')
That's the logic that's going to keep young people and those that are hesitant to vote her from feeling a need to actually vote

They said the same thing for Brexit, who followers "experts" anymore?

The thing that has a 99% change of happening, but doesn't happen, STILL DOESN'T HAPPEN.

>Trump's black support climbing every day
>Close race even in biased polls that were fixed to make Hillary appear to be winning
>Hillary melting down left and right and wikileaks bombshells still to drop

Lol ok CTR

Not suprising.

>d-don't vote for Donald Trump g-goy, he has no chances!!

They're not wrong. Every liberal city makes the whole state blue in the voting process, it's almost impossible for a republican to win

Trump literally gave his daughter to the jews.

Desperate shilling is desperate shilling.

"Mrs. Clinton’s chance of losing is about the same as the probability that an N.F.L. kicker misses a field goal from the 20-yard line."

Kek

He gave her to A Jew, not THE Jews.

90% chance? This is a new way of lying for the Dems. What is that number based on? And why are liberals so fucking brain dead

>Trump's black support climbing every day
You mean those guys he pretty much called niggers to their faces

>Fixed Polls
Any other conspiracy theories as to why trump is losing?

>Hillary melting down left and right and wikileaks bombshells still to drop
Yet miles ahead of trump, kek.
She's fighting with both hands tied behind her back and STILL winning.

>polls were wrong regarding brexit
>therefore polls are always unreliable

Don't be an idiot. Nothing is ever perfect but polls are reliable 80% of the time, which is why the US is the heavily polled nation on earth; the ruling elite need to know exactly what the commoners are thinking. You'd have to be an idiot to bet against Hillary's lead. I don't even want her to win, but you can't pussy out and run from reality.

Considering the jew pollsters put him at less than 1 percent to win the republican nomination this makes him a shoe in

I stand with her (on her knees)

>What is that number based on?

Read the article and find out

I've noticed even the Washington Post is less biased than them. They stopped even bothering to approve dissents in the comments. Almost every article is race-bait or virtue-signaling. Its sad, they used to be good.

((New York Times))

>"You mean those guys he called niggers to their faces"

Nice source! Hillary did call them super predators though, pretty sure Trump never said "nigger." Prove it.

>Nice conspiracy theory

Ugh except Reuters straight up admitted to "fixing" their polling methods so that Hillary won polls she had already lost

Are you even trying, CTR?

How much does CTR pay you?

>Look at my stats goyim
>Look at my polls goyim
>Stay at home goyim

desperate flailing attempt at demoralization delights den of nazis

You're either a faggot, or one retarded ass woman

Hillary has got the election in the bag. Guess the dems don't need to bother showing up to vote in November.

>conspiracy theories
here's one:
the DNC was rigged, leaked emails will prove it, and all the members governing the DNC will resign as a result

here's another one:
putin is in charge of all racist groups, the alt right and nationalist parties in the world

That chances are bad but NYT is going full kike here.

Even Nate Silver is only at 81% chance.

>forecast

aka "magic"

Best kicker in league Stephen Gostowski missed one yesterday

>Hillary has an overwhelming chance of beating Trump
>Trump was the better of a massive array of Republican candidates and was not even the favorite.
>Hillary couldn't even beat a geriatric socialist that was begging for shekels without cheating

Consider my record corrected.

The future is here

>"experts"
you'd still be shitting in the woods and foraging for berries without experts lad

But 10% can still happen

People have this shit way of Hillary is going to win, 90% says so, these graphs says so.. But when election day happen, when peoplle vote, it can be a whole different story

I'm sure that number won't ever change.

peoplespunditdaily.com/latest-polls/election-2016/us-presidential-election-daily-tracking-poll/

That's a good one

this
there's still a chance.

This is all daughters are used for

Okay trumptards, you're betting on a horse with no legs, there is 0 (ZERO) chance of you sad sacks winning this election.

Why even vote with those odds?
how about that for facts?

Josh Katz

Leftist facts everyone. You forgot to start the sentence with ' I feel '

>don't vote

Ok, that is especially telling that you are CTR.

Communist scum!

Shitlary is fucking hated in this country. The polls are paid for, her """""supporters""""" are paid for, and the media is paid for. Yet they STILL can't make people want to vote for that stupid, ugly, fat fucking cunt. Go anywhere and try to find a fucking shartlary sticker, it won't happen. Hell even on fucking Tinder if some girl's got political shit in their bio it's 10:1 for Trump/right wing stuff over leftist/SJW shit (and they STILL don't mention shartlary)

I like how everybody acts like a 10-20% is somehow more statistically relevant because of their feelings.

If you had to bet on a race between two horses, one had an 80% chance to win, and the other had a 20% chance, do you honestly believe that "oh stuff happens!"

Would you risk your money?

When someone interprets as derogatory almost anything that
is said about him (or about groups with whom he identifies)
we conclude that he has inferiority feelings or low self-esteem.
This tendency is pronounced among minority rights activists,
whether or not they belong to the minority groups whose rights they defend.
The terms “negro”, “oriental”, “handicapped” or “chick” for an African,
an Asian, a disabled person or a woman originally had no derogatory connotation.
“Broad” and “chick” were merely the feminine equivalents of “guy”, “dude” or “fellow”.
The negative connotations have been attached to these terms by the activists themselves.
Those who are most sensitive about
“politically incorrect” terminology are not the average black ghetto-dweller,
Asian immigrant, abused woman or disabled person, but a minority of activists,
many of whom do not even belong to any
“oppressed” group but come from privileged strata of society.
Political correctness has its stronghold among university students.
Many leftists have an intense identification
with the problems of groups that have an image of being weak (women),
defeated (American Indians), repellent (homosexuals) or otherwise inferior.

The leftists themselves feel that these groups are inferior.
They would never admit to themselves that they have such feelings,
but it is precisely because they do see these groups as
inferior that they identify with their problems.
(We do not mean to suggest that women, Indians, etc.
ARE inferior; we are only making a point about leftist psychology.)
Feminists are desperately anxious to prove that women are as strong and as capable as men.
Clearly they are nagged by a fear that women may NOT be as strong and as capable as men.
Modern leftish philosophers tend to dismiss reason, science,
objective reality and to insist that everything is culturally relative.
The leftist’s feelings of inferiority run so deep that he cannot tolerate any classification
of some things as successful or superior and other things as failed or inferior.
This also underlies the rejection by many leftists of the concept of
mental illness and of the utility of IQ tests.
Leftists may claim that their activism is motivated by compassion or by moral principles,
and moral principle does play a role for the leftist of the oversocialized type.
But compassion and moral principle cannot be the main motives for leftist activism.
Hostility is too prominent a component of leftist behavior; so is the drive for power.
Moreover, much leftist behavior is not rationally calculated to be
of benefit to the people whom the leftists claim to be trying to help.

LMFAO These same shills gave Trump a 2% chance of winning the nomination.

>stand with her
>stand
just

Hillary Clinton has a 90% chance of watching President Trump's re-election from a federal prison.

That doesn't change the fact trump is going to lose in november; someone has to be voting for her to win.

Trump has alienated and incited hatred in much more people than Hilliary ever has, he's burnt all his political bridges and thus has no future in politics.

The NY Slimes saying Clinton is going to win is equivalent to Joseph Goebbels in March 1945 saying the Germans are going to win,

Sorry to burst your little bubble, but leftist media propaganda is not reality.

I would say thats her odds are about at 60% odds at this point(pre debates). 90% odds is not even mathematically coherent.

...

...

Okay get fucked and kys shill, shartlary has no fucking support, there is no enthusiasm to vote for that fat cunt, she is certified FUCKING STUPID by the FBI, and despite the (((media))) doing everything it can to cover for her fat ass she is still fucking despised.

For a peaceful death on Nov 8, I suggest you use carbon monoxide.

I can't wait to mock Americans

Alright, I'm going to screencap your post and show it back to you once Hillary becomes president.

No I would look at them both and when it was obvious that one of them could barely walk to the starting gate, I would probably wonder how it was giving it an 80% chance to win.

The only people voting for Hillary will be on a jury.

We have to spread this the week before election day

Is this the Unabomber's manifesto?

no they didnt you moron, unless ur talking about the last few hours before the vote

no all he ever talked about was technology is bad

>Old Mexican proverb

TOP FUCKING PANDER

>nytimes

80% of people don't see this. Just because you think you do, and other people tell you they do, doesn't make it fact. You say she can barely walk to the starting gate, I look, and three others agree with me that you're wrong.

It is the Unabomber. I enjoyed his analysis of the liberal mindset.

that's objectively wrong, you haven't read it at all.

>don't vote goy!!
Oy fucking vey.

#MAGA

Why the fuck are the liberals doing this? It will just encourage liberal voters to stay home because they'll think it's in the bag.

...

what a load of bullshit, the election is not a fucking dice roll, there is no "chance".

Vote fraud

>inb4 b-but no, it can't happen in muh' freedomland

Becuase the alternative is worse for them.

If democrats had played this election fair from the start we'd probably be watching Trump vs Bernie.

>Increasing nervous man

I'm 70% sure her unpopularity and health is either going to force her to quit the race (she was two fucking hours late to her 15 minute "alt-right" speech, no explanation given) or just flat-out kill her, and (((they))) are going to have to bring in Bernie "The cuck" Sanders.

Shillary's death and a debate between The West and the east was demanded from the meme gods. Believe, and Kek will deliver.

I like those odds, spaniard

How 2 get hired for CTR.
Getting paid to use Sup Forums would be a dream!

Love these threads. So much mental gymnastics from trump supporters. I mean of course I'd like him to win but I know for a fact he won't. I just feel sorry for all the people who are gonna be slobbering on the end of a shotgun come November.

(((Rothschild)))

...

>I just feel sorry for all the people who are gonna be slobbering on the end of a shotgun come November.

In the words of the late great Crocodile dundee before he was gunned down by Australian police for his desire for freedom from government:

I do too.

Cool, so I might as well vote for Trump. You shouldn't care, right? I mean, it won't even put a dent in that 90% figure.

Have the vid: youtube.com/watch?v=CiJYGV8faZw

>polls are reliable 80% of the time

thanks dr. statistic

I sadly think they're right. No way the electoral college votes for trump.

I subscribe to the NY Times. They have done nothing but shill for Hillary for the past year. Paul Krugman even outright lied in an op-ed piece that tax policy would change under a Trump administration (the president doesn't set tax policy). They ran an article in the following days "correcting the record" but it's still insane that one of the most respected writers in the journalism industry had to LIE FOR HIS JOB!

tl;dr don't believe the NY Times on anything election related.

It must be a real chore to try and get people to vote for Hillary instead of Trump.

It's like trying to sneak a literal piece of shit into a dinner, you have to cover it with a fancy lid and then talk about how horrible all the other choices on the buffet are until the poor bastard finally takes the hidden lump of shit and leaves the table with his unreturnable choice.

Jew York times.

Remember when they gave Trump a 1% chance to win the Republican nomination?

>kiketimes
Okay.tiff

(((90% chance)))

>So there's no need for me to go vote since he's clearly going to lose :'(
That's the logic that's going to keep young people and those that are hesitant to vote him from feeling a need to actually vote

Don't tell this to Vikings fans

Some polls were 80/20

corbyn had 1% chance of winning the labour nomination yet he won