I subscribe to the NY Times. They have done nothing but shill for Hillary for the past year. Paul Krugman even outright lied in an op-ed piece that tax policy would change under a Trump administration (the president doesn't set tax policy). They ran an article in the following days "correcting the record" but it's still insane that one of the most respected writers in the journalism industry had to LIE FOR HIS JOB!
tl;dr don't believe the NY Times on anything election related.
It must be a real chore to try and get people to vote for Hillary instead of Trump.
It's like trying to sneak a literal piece of shit into a dinner, you have to cover it with a fancy lid and then talk about how horrible all the other choices on the buffet are until the poor bastard finally takes the hidden lump of shit and leaves the table with his unreturnable choice.
Jew York times.
Remember when they gave Trump a 1% chance to win the Republican nomination?
>kiketimes
Okay.tiff
(((90% chance)))
>So there's no need for me to go vote since he's clearly going to lose :'(
That's the logic that's going to keep young people and those that are hesitant to vote him from feeling a need to actually vote
Don't tell this to Vikings fans
Some polls were 80/20
corbyn had 1% chance of winning the labour nomination yet he won