What does Sup Forums think about this?

What does Sup Forums think about this?

I think if the parents are dumb enough to let their daughter put more focus on how she dresses instead of what is actually being thought in their schools then the school is in all its right to tell the dumb girl to go back and dress accordingly. If your daughter go dressed as a hooker in an environment that is supposed to be about learning then the school is not to blame or be critiziced for sending them home, but instead praised.

Instead of attacking the school, why don't they target the root issue which is that school is for learning, not for showing your body?

>Imblying they don't tell boys to not wear tanktops

When you cannot follow a simple written dress code you are telling the world that making sure you have the attention of the boys is more important to you than your education

>girls are too stupid to follow directions so please hold them to a lower standard

k

Girls ARE sexual objects though...

Because it's easier to attack the school.

These are the same lazy parents who attach their kids to the media in the first place instead of putting in the effort to raise them.

I feel bad for the ones that do care and have to deal with their kids being pressured to "dress like a slut" to fit in.

>Times New Roman

lazy 2/10

Yes.

Boy's education is far more important than anything girls do in school.

ADHERE TO YOUR SCHOOL'S DRESSCODE GUIDELINES YOU FUCKSTICK
YOU PAY TO SEND YOUR KID THERE SO YOU KNOW THE FUCKING RULES.

Girls are sexual objects.