What does Sup Forums think about this?

What does Sup Forums think about this?

I think if the parents are dumb enough to let their daughter put more focus on how she dresses instead of what is actually being thought in their schools then the school is in all its right to tell the dumb girl to go back and dress accordingly. If your daughter go dressed as a hooker in an environment that is supposed to be about learning then the school is not to blame or be critiziced for sending them home, but instead praised.

Instead of attacking the school, why don't they target the root issue which is that school is for learning, not for showing your body?

>Imblying they don't tell boys to not wear tanktops

When you cannot follow a simple written dress code you are telling the world that making sure you have the attention of the boys is more important to you than your education

>girls are too stupid to follow directions so please hold them to a lower standard

k

Girls ARE sexual objects though...

Because it's easier to attack the school.

These are the same lazy parents who attach their kids to the media in the first place instead of putting in the effort to raise them.

I feel bad for the ones that do care and have to deal with their kids being pressured to "dress like a slut" to fit in.

>Times New Roman

lazy 2/10

Yes.

Boy's education is far more important than anything girls do in school.

ADHERE TO YOUR SCHOOL'S DRESSCODE GUIDELINES YOU FUCKSTICK
YOU PAY TO SEND YOUR KID THERE SO YOU KNOW THE FUCKING RULES.

Girls are sexual objects.

SPBP

You interrupt your own education by showing up in those kinds of clothes. Before the year even begins you agree that you will follow the dress code. By disregarding the dress code you inconvenience the boys in an environment where they are already discouraged and handled poorly. Now you are adding boners to it because you wanted to look cute for boys.

》I wear this because it's comfortable

Schools have rules. Don't break the rules = don't get sent home.

Anyone who grew up in the UK knows that on non-school-uniform days girls will take the opportunity to dress like literal prostitutes.

Girls would constantly harp on about that the uniform rules were unfair against girls, even though they had the choice between trouser and knee-length skirts, where as boys had to wear trousers no matter how hot it got.

>girlswear slut clothes to attract attention to myself
>take away from valuable teach time, Lord knows we barely have enough as is
>change her into her PE uniform for the day, literally no one cares and pretends to pay attention at least
One chick's freedom of expression is a class full of guys with unwanted boners that aren't paying attention. Simple. What are you gonna do, teach adolescents not to have puberty?

>Women can dress like sexual objects.
>Don't treat them like sexual objects.

Reminds me of the American caning in Singapore where liberals were actually BTFO-d when a big part of the US started supporting the punishment of the libtard offender. I can but hope that families come out against BS like this, especially the women. Most women who actually run a family and don't go the divorce shill route are strongly against agitation like this and view it with all the tolerance of a tiger getting up to savage an irritating rodent.

>school has a dress code
>get bitchy when they don't let you get away with it

Try to show up as a boy in a wife-beater with a baseball cap on. They will tell you to change that.
The only difference is that boys generally don't insist on breaking the dress code every other day

Or follow the dress code laid out on the first day

Not that difficult

It's the rules mate, she won't be interrupted and sent home if she follows the. Fuck it's not a hard concept.

> teach teens not to want to fuck eachothers brains out.

Some days I welcome an Islamic takeover. Shut these stupid bitches up pretty fast when they aren't allowed wearing jack shit.

I'm for dress codes but not uniforms. Pants and a Tee shirt/button down is good. Keep it simple.

Of course SJW's think if we see some lovehandle we go full rape mode. Obviously not but we get a little out of focus. I had this class in early high school where the girl in front of me was thonging it every damn day. I didn't get shit done in there because I just wanted my face in that ass because I was 14 and my dick was up and down like a whacky waving inflatable arm tube guy.

These rules for girls are to protect staff too. People forget how easy it is to dunk on someone's career. I mean how easy would be to claim a teacher was trying to look up a skirt or some shit. Teenagers are the fatal flaw in gods plan and will say fucking anything. Imagine just showing up to work and next thing you've got a case because some wretched bitch with daddy issues doesn't like your class.

Do they need clothes at all? Are you Hitler? Just let them walk around naked. With some anal pleasure love beads hanging out her holes. It's 2016 for fuck's sake.

>dress like a sex-object
>behave like a sex object
>glorify sex objects in music, medi
>tell boys to not think of woman as sex objects.

k

>muh loins

everyone should be dressed modestly in a professional or educational environment, we shouldn't go to school to get laid, ot to 'express' ourselves, but to learn

we shouldn't go to work to flirt or be obnoxious, but to be productive

you can dress like a fucking idiot outside of these environments for all i care, just keep it away from educational and professional ones

Underrated

Also, the boys should be allowed to wave their dicks around. And teach too, why leave him out. Maybe masterbate like chimps, spraying love wee like lawn sprinkers. It's only the human body for fuck's sake.

Still 2016

Maybe boys and girls shouldn't be in the same class?

wtf is a 'sex object'?
don't use those cancerous feminist terms here

Let people do what they want. If a girl wants to dress like a whore, let her. If a young lad wants to fuck up his education because he's a hormonally charged degenerate, fuck him.

Boy should be able to masturbate in class
>Teach girls not to look.

I thought every single human being is a sexual object

sorry. Didn't realize it was a feminist term

Cock-sleeve?
Dick massager?

Take her on vacation, she wont give a shit

This goes both ways though. I got sent home once in junior high for only having a tank top.

Schools should just enforce a no clothes policy, that would solve the problem and it would make poor people happy as they wouldn't have to fork out for a uniform or spend money washing clothes everyday.

yes, clothing is oppressive towards minorities!

What is a sex object?

my obedient, conservative, blonde hair girlfriend thats not happy until she gets a steaming load of jizzum in her belly

Like they needed mufti days to dress like a slut!

When I was at school the girls would always roll their skirts up, wear shirts or blouses that were too small, wear blazers that were too tight. And don't forget the makeup plastered all over them...

That's a nice pic OP, here's mine.

>neck beards of the world: UNITE!

Boys have to dress appropriately too. Feminists need to stfu.

>whores are not sexual objects

but they are
literally the only function women have is spreading their legs and giving milk, thats it, they should be fucking treated like cattle

they were given voting rights and education and what did they do with those? vote democrat, feminism studies, complaining about how the world should fit their narrative instead of them becoming stronger or fitting the world, pushing race mixing, destroying nations

That's very hot and I you have good taste. But let's deduce this statement.

If a conservative girl is a sex object, and sex objects dress like hookers, then are conservative girls hookers?

Dress codes aren't for "keeping boys focused", they're protection for teachers against sue-happy women.

if more people die from drowing in the summer, and ice cream sales go up in summer, then ice-cream causes drowning?

not all sex objects dress like hookers. and my conservative girlfriend only dresses like a sex object underneath her normal outerwear. You'd never know how much she loved to dress sexy until you found out that ever single day, without fail, she wears the sexiest underwear she can find

You are all a bunch of crying faggots.
You know you hate slutty dressed women because of the cucks they all made you feel when you were at school

Putting rules to how women dress is even more gay than those college "safe spaces"

To me really it depends on the context and the preestablished rules set by the school.

If the school is letting guys wear tank tops but not letting girls wear skimpy clothes then fuck the school

If the school doesn't allow a lot of skin for either gender than its the girls being slutty

And if they have like a dress code/uniform set up (wear white shirts, blue pants, no tights or whatever) then you gotta ask the girls what the fuck are they expecting

It depends on the situation at hand

>you have good taste
does this not go without saying

>liberal girlfriend

heartykek.jpg

not even once.

you dont know what sex is until you have a conservative gal from a conservative upbringing that takes care of her body, isn't red-pilled because she was born that way, and stays healthy and fit.

>high school
>take shirt off
>teacher tells me to put it back on, this isn't a football field

Was I opressed?

>if more people die from drowing in the summer, and ice cream sales go up in summer, then ice-cream causes drowning?

This is irrelevant to my question because of the definitions put forward in the thread:
1. OP said she was dressed like a hooker
2. You defined the girl as a sex object
3. You also defined your conservative girlfriend as a sex object.

> not all sex objects dress like hookers.

So now we have determined that sex objects are not defined by how they dress.

>and my conservative girlfriend only dresses like a sex object underneath her normal outerwear.

But now sex objects are defined by how they dress.

So which is it, are sex objects defined by how they dress or not?

Even though you just contradicted yourself, let's try to understand what this is saying. From this we can infer that both hookers and conservatives are sex objects just one flaunts it openly and the other hides it.

>You'd never know how much she loved to dress sexy until you found out that ever single day, without fail, she wears the sexiest underwear she can find

hawt

no.
Its saying all women are sex-objects.

but really, woman are onlyh sex-objects leading up to and during sex.

afterwards, they are tender, loving, fragile sammich makers and homestead tenders.

>y-you too

Interesting.

>all women are sex-objects.

So perhaps instead of transwomen. We should call them transsex-objects.

nah, we should call them Exzibit X, Y, Z at the freak show.

trans people are just idiots / abused as kids that operate with a pathetically small scope of reality.

I can take walk around and tell people im really Skip James, and can indeed believe I am skip james for as long as i want. i can also believe i'm a woman, or a black Rastafarian whose real mind is walking around in a jungle somewhere eating kumquat but that doesn;t mean I havnt taken LSD.

>wear something distracting
>complain that you've distracted people

This is quite true. Permavirgins need to stop policing female bodies. Women should be allowed to show off their figure, if they want, because their bodies are their own.

OP needs some better education.

Yes, one hour long session of telling boys that girls are not attractive in any way will magically awake us from our eons-long period of evolution that ingrained in us a need to search out a fertile mate for the sole purpose of reproduction.

Stupid fucking feminists.

THIS
H
I
S

take note fellows. Abstain from procreation with liberal females. Let your peers know that only conservative cuties turn you on. "Feminists" will have a much harder time recruiting when women get the hint that politicizing their crazy bullshit isn;t a turn on

>boys/men literally never violating school or business dress codes
>boys/men never wearing shorts too short, or showing too much collarbone/back skin, stomach area

Come on, ladies. It's not hard. You have a lot of options to express your individuality via clothing choices that don't involve 70% of your skin exposed.

I agree, and I was having fun with the definition. I also think all women are sex-objects. Hence the redundancy of the term and why I don't understand the usage of such a phrase.

When you INTERRUPT a boy's school day by punishing him for telling a girl she has nice tits, or send him home for admiring dat ass, You are telling him that making sure girls having a safe space is more important than his education or freedom of speech.

Instead of shaming boys for their freedoms, teach girls to respect the first amendment.

>you are telling her that making sure boys have a distraction free learning environment is more important than her education

ARE YOU FUCKING SERIOUS

WHEN I GREW UP, DISTRACTIONS WERE KICKED OUT OF THE CLASSROOM FOR DISTRACTING PEOPLE

THEY'RE TRYING TO LEARN YOU FUCKING WHORE, STOP FLASHING YOUR TITS AND GO PUT SOME FUCKING CLOTHES ON

YOUR EDUCATION IS NOT MORE IMPORTANT THAN THEIRS

Females are sexual objects though. They have nothing else to offer the world besides their bodies.

Ahh another one. Perhaps you can tell me, what is a sex object?

Dress codes for girls aren't just to keep boys distraction free. It's to keep OTHER GIRLS also distraction free. When one starts to dress sluttier, others will feel pressured to one up them in an arms race of more revealing clothes until everyone is fucking distracted. Girls are chaos in the flesh.

>You have a lot of options
This is something I'm actually going to disagree with. Girls clothes have gradually gotten sluttier and sluttier over the years. They're actually getting less and less choice in modest clothes that don't look like granny shit, and more and more clothes that have their asses hanging out of their shorts. Modern (((fashion))) gets worse and worse. Even when girls are pressured and they might (but mostly can't because they hate social ostricization) resist, they have to go out of their way to find non-slutty clothes. Half of the shit in the stores is see-through now.

I wish American fashion trends were more like those in Asia. Elegant, not slutty, but not prudish.

or girls could come not dressed as skanks to school

Of course they conveniently forget that boys have to conform to (usually stricter) dress codes too. They get told to tuck their shirts in constantly but they don't try and turn it into some political thing.

Anyone else tired of women? Dressing like sluts doesnt turn me on it just grosses me out desu. Like do they realize porn exists and at any time I can look at a literal 10/10 instead of their frumpy 5/10 cheese ass.

I feel like you're supposed to be attracted to slutty women, that's the whole point. They're manipulating your subconscious (whether it's intentional or not). Although I'm not MGTOW, I've learned a lot from it.

I don't want to judge women with the head of my penis. I'm not some sex-driven monster. I want to judge them by their character, so that's why it bothers me personally. It's degeneracy.


I'm more attracted to moderate girls with an amazing sense of humor

>teach boys that girls aren't sexual objects just because they dress like sexual objects

This is getting into some pretty fucking creepy territory. Why do liberals defend sexualizing ids?

Honestly torn on this. I think banning pornography would go further to clear men's and boys' mental distractions in the academic environment. But there's no denying that Mendel and Einstein didn't have to deal with asses hanging out of shorts when they were getting educated.

How dare someone imply the needs of the many outweigh the needs of the few

This has fucking nothing to do with feminism, and any "feminists" that think it does need to take a hike. It's called a PROFESSIONAL ENVIRONMENT. Just like working at an office, there is a dress code expected of every man, woman, and whatever the fuck designation tumblr has come out with. It shows respect for one's fellow students, respect for the teaching staff who have to put up with kiddie crap 5 days a week for shitty pay, and it shows respect to the idea of learning itself. They should be glad that we're not like Japan, where every public school from Junior High on up shoves a stock uniform down everyone's throats.

If they want to complain that girls are being more heavily punished for comparable dress code violations, that's another story.

It's a dress code. I work in a school, and standards of conformity are expected. The worst is mufty day when they wear anything, and girls come in wearing skimpy tops, bare midriffs and short skirts. It's inappropriate to let your underage teenage daughter go to what is effectively a place of work. It distracts girls and boys because they're checking each other out and comparing fashion choices. It makes me uncomfortable having teenage girls almost popping out in the classroom, but what can I say? When I read a story in the news about teachers in another school telling parents to dress children properly because is was a 'distraction' in class, the comments section frequently expressed the opinion that it was only a 'distraction' if the male staff were paedos.

"You know what hunny? Its fine, dress in booty shorts and a cut off tank top to your junior high classes. I hope you find a nice black boy to culturally enrich you as well".

bold letters. hysterical. obviously written by a woman.

completely disregarded, like everything a woman says or writes.

it's all mindless drivel and not worth paying attention to.

literally mindless objects for breeding and nothing more.

fuck em

So if all the boys have their dicks out all day that is okay, right? You aren't going to send them home just because they are a distraction, right?

Banning pornography will be even less effective than banning alcohol during prohibition, drugs during the War on Drugs, terrorists during the War on Terror, guns during the Left's Wet Dreams, niggers during the War on Poverty, or dirty reds during the Cold War. Government simply does not have the ability to cut off supply. If you want things to change, focus on demand instead: make people no longer desire pornography. A grassroots effort can go a long way to doing that - to convincing men to man up, get a girlfriend, and quit watching the Jew's degenerate filth. It sounds harder to change demand, but in the end it's actually easier.

- No one has told her to stop learning, once the rules that have always been there are applied, no issue.

- All they have done is told them what they should tell boys with their trousers round their knees.

- Idiots that can't work that out should not teach at schools or tell them how to teach.

- Uniforms are there so people are engaging with the content of the class not engaging in a day-to-day slow striptease, on either side of the booth.

- Strict environments and very subtle taboo are sexy.

t. the official spokesperson of the alt-right-look-at-my-frog