Is your body ready for WW3?
God yes
won't be drafted because of my autism so why not
i hope a war happens
the world won't be boring anymore
Hopefully our side wins, right?
>our side
>Australia thinks we're allies
>we're actually occupying them
weaponized dropbears
whats a good country to move to where i can watch the damage unfold from a safe distance?
unironically only central africa wont have a hand if a ww3 happens. But that might be less safe than being a soldier
Hell yeah, Strayans are fucking based
>be me, training with ADF
>buddy is a 6'4" beefy black guy, we get tasked to find some Australian officer in another camp
>"hey there, do you know where we can find Captain Whoever?"
>"yeah m8 'e's over there by that group 'o Diggers ova there"
>black buddy goes silent
>"w...what the fuck did you say?"
>"he's by thems Diggers right there m8"
And that's how we learned the story of Australian soldiers in WW1
I think the soldier knew Digger sounded like nigger, lol
How do the local sheilas like our boys?
either fat or underaged. We were out in the middle of nowhere, so that might've been why.
I kinda wanted to see an aboriginal
No I will run away
imagine if chinese warships and marines did invasion exercises with the cubans off the gulf of mexico. lmao how beta do you have to be to put up with that shit near your border
>____ thinks we’re allies
I'm ready for US invaders to get BTFO by based China.
Yeah sure ill kill chinks why not. We'll never go to war with Japan again so its the next best thing
kys weeb
I'm tired of this fake "peace"
>i want to kill japs but i cant
>this makes me a weeb
Learn to read cunt
bend or break. those are the only two options for any american adversary
Can youse do a false flag against Japs? I didn't get a chance to hang out with yanks and shoot nips all day coz i wasnt born last time
After Brexit, your ass is ours.
Fucking this!!
I wish
I am ready for nukes dropping on both china and USA while entire japan will sink into ocean thanks to both sides attacking japan for muh war crimes and if we don't nuke you more people will die bullshit
I dare Canada to try to draft me. I fucking dare them.
China is 4000km away from Australia.
You really don't want to replace the Pax Americana with a Chinese hyperpower, trust me.
I am waiting for China to march into Pyongyang. Eventually cultivating the land's untapped precious metal deposits. South Korea and the US won't do shit.
Lel
Don't worry. Castreau will probably ban the military or use them to force multiculturalism on y'all.
>we're on Chinas side
woops haha
>Canada sends its best trans, disabled, PoC unit
I really hope you fucking forget the southern hemisphere exists once you start nuking each other.
>Anybody thinking America is an ally and not a mob boss getting protection money
>i wasnt born last time
same bro
australia should really up its defense budget, btw buy our f-35s plz
For sure. It's actually double Canada's but we'd still make the money back easily by not joining retarded hedgemonic wars and being an economic pawn
i sympathize. war is a racket
Yeah you can buy some of our planes and invade kiwiland.
Australians, why is malcom turnbull appearing on channel 7 all the time with tanks and aircraft carriers and things, are we going to war?
Wouldn't it make economic sense to side with china on this?
Are yanks the only species jingoistic enough to die for their cunt?
You are in an impossible situation with China. It makes sense to make good mates with them, but they will absorb y'all if you give them an inch.
The Russians probably are our equals in that respect.
>Be Australia
>Ally with the US
>US spends the majority of the last of the 72 years upholding alliances at all costs
>Chinks start arcing up
>US needs a stable country near China it can use to continue to uphold said alliances
>"But AMERIKKA is nothing but a mob boss, it's all about muh protection money and oil!!!!111!!"
Fucking Melbourne, should have spent those 3 years getting your liberal arts degree learning about geopolitics instead.
>Australians, why is malcom turnbull appearing on channel 7 all the time with tanks and aircraft carriers and things, are we going to war?
Not likely at this current time, it's mostly a show of force. No doubt Chinese state-runned media are frothing at the mouth about "Aggressive Australians showing off their military hardware to challenge China" despite literally every country doing it all the time.
>Wouldn't it make economic sense to side with china on this?
Economic sense yes, but countries arent protected by economic power. Countries put preservation before economies, from a governmental perspective, preservation is absolute, so having a collapsed or damaged economy is far better than losing protection and being invaded.
What do you mean upholding it at all costs? I don't know anything about politics but noam chomsky told me they spent 50s - present overthrowing foreign governments for their own gain.
Doesn't economic power == protection?
I guess if we side with china we'll always be supplicant to them economically, but we're currently also in the position with USA right?
desu I hope china thoroughly evicts us from the west pacific so we can have a peaceful multilateral multipolar world.
you can see for yourself how china treats its asian neighbors, and you'd still rather partner with that than with america? i give up
>I kinda wanted to see an aboriginal
No you don't.
>What do you mean upholding it at all costs?
So basically, the US needs it allies and needs to uphold all its alliances it has. Countries flock to the largest power for protection because preservation is main priority for all governments. This is a good thing for the US seeing as it can operate and use bases all over the world to keep the status quo. But if they fail to uphold an alliance, like if a US ally gets invaded tomorrow and the US does nothing about it, then that will raise questions about all other US allliances and their integrity. In short, it'll likely cause a domino effect of countries abandoning US protection if they know the US wont come to help them in time of need.
>noam chomsky told me they spent 50s - present overthrowing foreign governments for their own gain.
I mean, in a real vague way, yeah, but it's also important to know that any other country that has to power to overthrow foreign governments for their own gain will. The only reason countries other than the US havent overthrown any lately, is because they've been "contained" by US power in a way.
>Doesn't economic power == protection?
Not always, a lot of the time having a stronger economy will make you larger target to your neighbors, especially if its something they dont have and yours is unprotected, like natural resources, or even water.
>I guess if we side with china we'll always be supplicant to them economically, but we're currently also in the position with USA right?
Well, our largest trader is China, but our largest source of protection and foreign investment is actually the US, by a large margin. Basically Australian geopolitics dictates that we must ally ourselves with the largest naval power, which it was at first Britain, then the US, for the sake of protecting our trade, so we rely on trade, but we rely on protecting that trade much more since we can always find more buyers.
Immunity to radioactivity.
What country in the Southern Hemisphere could potentially get nuked? Serious question
>defense minister
that name is very convenient
attack minister
I'm 100% sure Australia will get a big fat one.
Then there's a slight chance those countries with American bases get attacked.
But if you take Israel's "Samson Option" into account, we're all getting nuked by the vile jew.
Nuking Australia seems rather pointless desu
>But if you take Israel's "Samson Option" into account
Nah
Is China actually a threat? I never understood the fearmongering around them. They have good relations with european countries and with Silkroad 2.0 I see them only becoming better
Aussie and Poo Peeland.
In Sudacalandia I think only Colombia is a US cuck. On the opposite side there's Venezuela, but it would be a waste nuking it when it's just crashing itself with lack of food, tp and medicines.
I always thought NZ probably the safest place on earth.
>Countries flock to the largest power for protection because preservation is main priority for all governments
ackchyually, according to the balance of power theory, countries will unite against the largest power for protection because preservation is the main priority for all governments.
It's probably the least safe if they get a rain of megatons, being the most geographically isolated country in the world, in a post-apocalyptic scenario where everything has stopped functioning, from public services to shipping and commerce.
Literally set up for a Mad Max happening.
I'm ready make it quick
>mfw the US, China and Russia get completely nuked off the planet
Name a better outcome. I'll wait.
The balance of power theory made its appearance in the mid-16th century, the theory hasn't been applicable since the end of the cold war, since then, no dynamics of power balancing have happened because of the emergence of a global power, something people in the 16th century couldn't predict. The US's very presence in Europe and how its stopped Germany and France fighting is proof that balance of power theory is irrelevant.
switzerland is nuked instead
Yes, I will buy all the canned food from the stores then sell it to the black market during the war for gold. Then I'll probably make a team with some friendd and loot houses. When I'll be riche enough, I will run away from the war.
The balance of power is still very relevant, have you missed the everything that has happened in the Asia-Pacific in the last few years? the emerging "Quad" is a good reminder that the balance of power is still alive and well. America is just the Britain of the new century, who will enjoy "splendid isolation" as long as the world in operating under their yoke. We're seeing the EU drift away from the US as well. I think it was more to do with the sudden collapse of the USSR which left the US with near hegemonic power for a few decades.
>have you missed the everything that has happened in the Asia-Pacific in the last few years?
The balance of power says that "the States Must Join the Weaker Side in a Conflict", the Quad is literally the opposite, China is the weaker side in this conflict and all they have going for them is Pakistan, who China is essentially using Pakistan as an alternate route for their energy needs so China rely's less on the Malacca strait.
>America is just the Britain of the new century, who will enjoy "splendid isolation" as long as the world in operating under their yoke. I think it was more to do with the sudden collapse of the USSR which left the US with near hegemonic power for a few decades
America is geographically the luckiest place on the planet, they have unique geographic features found nowhere else that make the continental united states almost invulnerable to conventional attack, coupled with the fact it's its a 2-ocean power with outward warm water ports protecting both its coasts and lack of threatening neighbors makes the US the ideal candidate for global hegemony. No one on the earth is capable of doing what the US is doing right now with such efficiency. China can try, but they still only have access to one ocean from their homeland of which they can only patrol with a green water navy, not a blue water, they still have easy access points from Manchuria and Vietnam, and their 3 largest rivers all vulnerably come from Tibet.
>We're seeing the EU drift away from the US as well.
Tariffs arent the EU drifting away from the US, Europe needs US protection, without a single overwhelming presence in Europe assuring security, France and Germany will fight each other. Without NATO, the Russians will once again expand outwards to protect the heartland of Moscow, which will lead to France and Germany fighting each other and as history has proven many times, will drag the US in, which is why the Americans decided to not leave after WW2.
America also has to contend with the tyranny of distance when considering it's ability to pose a real threat to a major country, never-mind to a coalition of many states balancing against them. Without allies to act as a logistics base in the region, they have a fairly limited long term power-projection. China is the most powerful state in the region and will only grow more powerful, is in a geographic position to pose a legitimate and long term threat, and is thus causing a regional balance of power against them, with America acting as an offshore-balancer. China also has a tentative alliance with Russia against the US. Of-course, the nature of war has changed somewhat and strike capability is now on a global scale, but to hold on to conquered territory you still need boots on the ground—boots which the US can't threaten but China certainly can (or will soon be able to). The Pacific and Atlantic are to the US what the English Channel was to the British Empire, and it is notable that during Pax Britannica, in which England held a similar position to what the US holds now, they weren't interested in directly dominating the European continent. The EU, if able to federate, will build its own military assets and form its own foreign policy when capable of balancing against Russia. I don't think it will cut off from NATO completely, but it will act far less like the US' lapdog.
I cant stand the fact that i will have to blow up bridges, railroads, airports and plant IEDs for NATO columns if it starts.
I will have to give my gf to lure a NATO officer into her room and kill him while the man has a boner thinking its time for sex.
Do you know how hot the blood is once you slit a throat? Its hot and it feels so bad it hurts you on touch, the pain is psychological, worse than physical.
How many croatian, hungarian, british, american... mothers will get letters notifying their sons died in an area that was supposed to be calm and friendly?
How many of our own will die? What if one or all of my brothers die as well? How can i tell that to mom or dad? What if my parents die? My sister? My nephews?
Who the fuck can look forward to that?
You know what the worse part is? Its the fact that this conventional or guerrilla fighting will last for 20 days maximum, until the sausages of apocalypse start flying.
But thats war, i dont like it, im not ready for it, nobody is, nobody can prepare for it. Especially the faggots on the internet that never kissed a girl that think it is their moment to shit.
You will all die virgins if it happens. Even if you arent one, your life is destroyed no matter what. You will never be happy after it, you can pretend but you wont be happy ever again.
>without a single overwhelming presence in Europe assuring security, France and Germany will fight each other
nah, if shit hit the fan, France and Germany would stick together and create a common military to dominate Europe.
Weather or not Russia would invade Eastern Europe is also questionable, since Russia might seek European allies against Chinese threat
This is bait, right?
you think Russians are not as jingoistic as you?
Russians go apeshit when you slightly mention ill of their countries, and no, I'm not talking about the russian posters on here.
i'm literally in the safest place in the world in the case of a ww
Why the fuck would anyone want to be ruled by a mob boss ?