Korea, why are you guys so bad at electing presidents?

Korea, why are you guys so bad at electing presidents?

Attached: Stupid Koreans.png (1282x830, 1.62M)

Other urls found in this thread:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gaoli_bangzi
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Assassination_of_Park_Chung-hee
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

Cuz the cuntry was fucked up even from the beginning

>checks flag
You really asking that question?

Some of them are not 'elected', by the way.

Turns out democracy is a shit system.

The first president was strongly supported by stupid foreign terrorist country.
That was the beginning of mistake.

Their proper ruler is either Chinese or Japanese emperor. And since last chink dynasty got extinct, it's not like there is any choice left now.

Koreans and democracy do not function. You have to understand that these people lived under confucian emperors for millennia.
The thought of actually “electing” presidents in a liberal and democratic way is impossible.

Look at East Asia.
Japan’s barely a democracy.
Taiwan only gained open elections in 2004.
Singapore is a one party state.
China one party state.
Vietnam one party state.
North Korea, monarchy.

The ones who are not elected are better than those who are.

Every Chinese imperial dynasty went extinct at some point, user.

But... =^]

Attached: 4226A227-3F6B-4C61-B8D1-7FB4C42D9B60.jpg (4000x2250, 1.72M)

Korea doesn't have national identity
They're ruled by china from beginning of ancient Chinese civilization and then became japanese land
They're not used to the fake identity that they have, because they are proud of their history which is basically chinese history, and is proud of their economy which is basically japanese economy
It's doomed to be a state belonging to other superior nation

Attached: geoside_korea.jpg (1258x850, 129K)

Jjokbari oks

Attached: CA7278E2-9A46-4856-81B9-9C8D0266B982.jpg (300x200, 31K)

Confucianism will want experienced and wise people to be up there leading, instead of shitty ones that average civilians like
Japan is democracy but since this kind of thinking exists, it's always the most experienced party LDP leading japan
SG, china isn't democracy at all, but the core thinking is same
They're leading the entire cunt since new china and independent Singapore so no one else if for in Confucianism thought

Then tell me when you're actually independent from china, mongols, manchus and japan other than korean Jesus and Confucius shit

>One party is dominant in Japan
>It's because they're the most experienced!
>One party is dominant in Singapore
>明るい北朝鮮
Japanese people are so naive it's laughable.

I never said anything bad desu senpai
I mean that you guys don't elect others because your labor whatever party is most experienced
And well if you'd call it better than japan you're the naive one though

>高麗棒子
>고려봉자
>the term is originated from the baton-wielding Korean guards during the Japanese occupation of Manchuria. Not trusted by the Japanese, the Korean guards were not given firearms, only batons. The guards often enjoyed teasing Chinese people and beating them with batons, earning enmity among the Chinese.
How can you ever trust these people?

President Moon Jae-in is a qt

Attached: mji2.jpg (522x832, 117K)

You don't
Look at nk, it's a good representation of how gooks are in their natural form

Goguryeo, Gojoseon, Early Goryeo
>inb4 It’s a China history

At least they arrest the bad guys in power, the better than other countries that could not.

Yeah they are delusional

Japan is a one party state even though it is a “democracy”.

WE WUZ TUNGUSTIC N SHIEET

China doesn’t claim those dynasties. They claim there were Chinese people in them alongside Koreans and other groups.

“Muh ancient korean dynasties” hahahahahaahahhaa

t. Nisei

I knew it kek
Thanks for posting down the failed dynasties
1st one is made by chinese person that occupied korea
2nd one is literally fake history that is as true as xia dynasty of china
3rd one is tang dynasty guy coming to korea to get them done
And you still claim korean history to be not chinese history lmao
You can say whatever you want but it's all Chinese history

>Japan is a one party state even though it is a “democracy”.
No it is not, but it's a "dominant party state"

Japanese people come from Goguryeo

#fact

looks jap as fuck

>no source

It's because koreans are stupid, We need Japan back so we not shithole anymore

So, what's up with the male suicide rate? What are the reasons? Bet self-hating europeans dream for it to be as high.

what is the term in english

Cuck

I don't think there is English equivalent. It is pronounced as "Gaoli bangzi" which literally means "Gogyryeo bludgeon".

DELETE THIS

Attached: mji4.jpg (740x524, 40K)

How to Ghouls nest building
1.pick up one of Asian flag(JAPAN,Korea etc..)to make a new tread .
2,OP look down special closely country of OP flag.this tread is 2-B pattern.
3,Suddenly Nonhumans swarm.(nothing have been Job &have livelihooder)
4.go to PornHab watch,Tepodon,eat,shit,sleep
5. next evening, wake up,on,search save some little girls images....1~repeat.endless ............................................................die........born to change the first time human or pig.

Thailand also still makes it illegal to criticize the king.

hmmmm
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gaoli_bangzi
>One false and incorrect belief is that the term originated from the baton-wielding Korean guards during the Japanese occupation of Manchuria.

The origin could be earlier than that. But Korean behaviour in occupied Manchuria certainly helped to spread that term again.

Because he is asking about Korea not his own flag, you fucking idiot?

So does Spain. Not even memeing. Insult the king and go to jail. Happened in Catalonia recently.

This

Koreans also massacred Vietnamese civilians all the time. They hate Koreans

The problem with Japan is that opposition parties are mostly leftists/paid Chinese operatives.

Works alright if you don't have a culture inclined towards totalitarian insect collectivist subhumanism.

Insults aren't criticism, user.

I dunno, some European countries like Sweden are also highly collectivist.

at least they make an active effort to bring charges and bring their leaders to justice. that's arguably even more democratic than here. much respect for trying to maintain the rule of law, so many countries don't even try

If only Hillary Clinton were in a prison jumpsuit now like Park Geun-hye...

our two parties are a fucking sham, just one globalist circus act after the other

It has a lot to do with religion. Lutheranism and Orthodoxy are more collectivist than Catholicism.

Didn't Ukraine put Yulia Tymoshenko on trial for corruption? I mean, fucking Ukraine for god's sake tried harder to convict corrupt politicians than we have.

Spain still has a King?

>mfw Australia is like 6% Chinese and 10% East or Southeast Asian overall

Attached: 1518574894987.gif (500x500, 2.98M)

the problem isn't really president election but korean culture itself where cronyism and nepotism have been rampant, which inevitably create a massive backlash after a term, combined with another tradition of putting the boot in former rulers. not only with domestic rulers, but they've done similar things with foreign rulers throughout history: despite "brotherhood" they had often said, they slaughtered remnants of the ming dynasty after manchu takeover to such an extent that even a manchu general lamented their heartless massacre, and then they killed and teased manchus as well on the coattails of imperial japan, and then they can't stop shitting on japan today. it's a pretty repugnant culture.

Attached: 1495710444227.jpg (250x243, 7K)

look at that jawline and full head of hair.

how come he's asian??

Go check yourself with wikipedia or something no one has obligation to provide you source, gook

there are plenty of people who can grow facial hair, are you fucking dumb?
oh wait brazil monkey nigger lmao

Didn't they take Ming Dynasty refugees?

>korea arrests another corrupt former president
>meanwhile corrupt american officials roam freely operating their shell companies and lobbying corporations and sacrificing to molech

Attached: 1521061149430.jpg (640x480, 92K)

How are Asian jawlines supposed to look like

Attached: 1520829628147.jpg (640x628, 266K)

YOU are dumb you stupid fuck who can't read english for shit. I mentioned that he's not balding and actually has a manly square jaw even though he's asian and fucking old.

because of retarded koreans like you that i will always think of koreans as asian favelados.

round like a soyboy's
since they keep eatin soy everyday

>he's not balding and actually has a manly square jaw even though he's asian
Asian are more likely to be not bald than White and Black. What are you saying? And there are some people who have that kinda jaw

do something

they don't bald because they got no T

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Assassination_of_Park_Chung-hee

who was in the wrong here?

Attached: movieposter.jpg (279x402, 30K)

>muh testerone
This is state of brainlet monkey

Attached: images (1).jpg (267x188, 7K)

>koreans are asian favelados

spot on

Why are Japanese always full in Korean thread?
And why do japs always try to manipulate images of Korea with lies

Attached: DVtOEKqXcAENLfV.jpg (960x720, 48K)

Lack of democratic tradition. Same story for most new democratic countries in the world.

>mfw Jap think they're democracy

Attached: 1502432819031.png (1011x1354, 368K)

Too much hate, they can't stop thinking about us.

Attached: 1520920656335.jpg (868x7190, 1.46M)

Fact check
> 1. Goguryeo was a Korean dynasty
> 2. The Japanese royal family and all Japanese are descendants of ancient Koreans
>3. Japanese is derived from Korean

It is a historical truth that can not be literally taught in Japan.
The world except Japan knows :^)

>> 1. Goguryeo was a Korean dynasty
nope, it wasn't. there was no such thing as "korea" or "korean" at that time. kogryo was founded and ruled by ancient manchurian people, while what is known to be korean today was descended from what ancient china called as samhan, literally "three-han", after which south korea, daeHANminguk, was named. so, you do know where you actually came from, and this is why china has a point in this matter - if manchurians became chinese then koguryo should be part of chinese history, because it was their ancestors who ruled the clay, not the people from the peninsula (samhan). this trend --people from china or manchuria dominates indigenous people on the peninsula-- is seen throughout the history of so called korea, and yet modern koreans can't help but larp as ancient manchurians and kogryo out of inferiority complex.
>> 2. The Japanese royal family and all Japanese are descendants of ancient Koreans
this is also a typical korean wetdream and larping out of inferiority complex. korea isn't as old as koreans think it to be.
. Japanese is derived from Korean
this delusion is also an embodiment of korean inferiority complex and desire to be part of yamato master race to whitewash the miserable slave history, as the world except korea knows :^)

>japanese history revisionism
japanese are baekje koreans who moved to japan. everyone knows that

lol baekje was literally one of ancient yamato's bitches. even kogryo's document proves this.


>百殘新羅舊是屬民由來朝貢而倭以耒卯年來渡海破百殘連侵新羅以為臣民
>Baekje and Silla had been vassals of Goguryeo, but Japan, crossing sea, defeated them in 391, and made them its subjects.

nonsense. korea btfo japan's pirate ships left and right and then hideyoshi asked korea to ally with japan against china so he could steal trade from the ming dynasty because he didn't want to pay high commission taxes to the portuguese anymore. and then imjin war happened and korea btfo japs again. japan had less technology than korea at that time and couldn't even put cannons on their ships because the ships were so weak they couldn't handle the recoil

"Experience" is a low bar in Japan after the dumpster fire of 2009-12

lmao you have no idea what you are talking about. yamato's domination over baekje and shilla was way before the period of imjin war. and korea's oldest extant history books like samguksagi also show lots of yamato's invasions which not only destroyed castles but easily encircled shilla's capital, present-day gyeongju. they were always weak. if they had been stronk they wouldn't have accepted the unfair term of sending the precious princes to yamato as hostages, eh. they were, make no mistake, dominated by the yamato as usual.

and no, during the imjin war period japan btfo korea pretty easily as well.
>korea btfo japan's pirate ships left and right
nope, gooks are still butthurt about japanese pirates' rampage in that period, saying lots of cultural heritages were burnt down to the ground by them. they easily landed on korea and did whatever they want. it was so rampant that the reference to wakou pirates became a cliche in modern korea when they lament korea's lack of historical remains - "wakou/hideyoshi burnt them!". you see, even the emperor of ming asked japan's shogun to cooperate with them in cracking down on them, because they btfo chinese coastal cities as well. you are naive if you really believe the fucking vassal korea was able to handle it on their own.

>and then imjin war happened and korea btfo japs again.
if you are a gookleaf you should know how devastating the imjin war was to korea, which lost a million to hideyoshi at play. the entire peninsula was conquered by japan within weeks and only when korean royals were about to abandon the country, did chinese reinforcement arrive and manage to retake pyonyang, even though they were also crushed by japan later in the battle of byeokjegwan. china itself admitted they and their vassal korea would have stood no chance, had it not been for hideyoshi's death. how's it even possible for the vassal korea to have such a delusion?

Attached: imjin war in a nutshell.jpg (1041x1177, 727K)

>jap historical revisionism
you dumb weeb. you're just making stupid shit up

siege of jinju:
16,000 japs
6,000 koreans
korean victory

siege of haengju:
30,000 japs
2,300 koreans
korean victory

battle of myeongnyang:
330 jap ships
13 korean ships
korean victory

the fact that japs lost these battles with ridiculously huge advantages in numbers shows how feeble the japs were compared to the koreans. the jap invasion lasted several years and still couldn't conquer korea entirely. and the ming didn't do shit but accept bribes and retreat at every turn. had the ming general refused the bribe and offer from japan to allow jap troops to move out of pyongyang after the koreans cut off jap supplies, hideyoshi's campaign would've ended. but instead of listening to the koreans telling the chink army to attack the japs, they accepted the offer and let the japs resupply because chinks are cowards. chinks are as incompetent as japs when it comes to warfare. that's why the japs retreated, because they were running low on supplies and knew that their plan to capture beijing wouldn't work as long as korea didn't let them reach it
even after the war was over, the japs asked for diplomatic exchanges and koreans would send lower rank diplomats to meet the jap ruler and shogunate, while japs diplomats meeting in korea would be met by low ranking officials

simple, they literally don't have anyone that can be considered as viable choice

t. ant

Fucking this, my occidental Bro

>yamato's domination over baekje and shilla was way before the period of imjin war
baekje and japan were allied you dumbass

didnt that one japanese emperor said they were descendants of baekjae or someshit

but hey if japan wants to diddle with their glorious past of domination unlike right now with their cucked """army""" and cucked culture just like every other nation under jewish rule, i can understand, were on the same boat here

the discovery (in Japan) that the "Inariyama sword, as well as some other swords discovered in Japan, utilized the Korean 'Idu' system of writing". The swords "originated in Paekche and that the kings named in their inscriptions represent Paekche kings rather than Japanese kings".[9] The techniques for making these swords were the apparently similar to styles from Korea, specifically from Baekje

A lot of American subcultures are also collectivist, Pablo.

>Other historians, such as those who collaborated on 'Paekche of Korea and the Origin of Yamato Japan' and Jonathan W. Best, who helped translate what was left of the Baekje annals,[12] have noted that these princes set up schools in Yamato Japan and took control of the Japanese naval forces during the war with Goguryeo, taking this as evidence of them being more along the lines of diplomats with some kind of familial tie to the Japanese imperial family and as evidence against any hostage status
>Recently in 2008, Japan has allowed controlled limited access to foreign archaeologists, but the international community still has many unanswered questions. National Geographic has written that Japan "the agency has kept access to the tombs restricted, prompting rumors that officials fear excavation would reveal bloodline links between the "pure" imperial family and Korea—or that some tombs hold no royal remains at all."[13]
japs are self-conscious of their korean origins

Electing a chad is not a bad thing

Attached: koreapres.jpg (780x520, 152K)

which ones

>Implying that dictators are better
Those who were hungry for power massacred so many innocent ones for their own ass.

You mean USA?

>Putin the Russian czar
Do you guys even have guts to say cyka blyat on his face?

Show me one korean imageboard.

I need some friends.

Attached: 1518776581720.png (300x274, 60K)

>being this delusional gook
top kekky

>the jap invasion lasted several years and still couldn't conquer korea entirely.
japan steamrolled and conquered literally the ENTIRE korea within WEEKS, retard. the SOLE reason why japan retreated from pyonyang after this lightning conquest was the ming reinforcement which pushed back the vanguard which was in food shortage due to this fast advance in pyongyang. korea itself had no capability to retake it by themselves, nor could they defeat japanese armies in the field, except for those temporal successes (with extremely padded numbers as usual) during some irrelevant sieges, omitting aftermath or big picture like:
>The Japanese returned the next summer and burned Jinju to the ground.[1]
>not only was it a meme hyped in a book made by the posterity to idolize yi, based solely on his padded personal reports, but gooks usually omit the very fact that his 13 ships, escaping from the naval base about to be destroyed by japan, were literally the last of the korean navy at that point which had been utterly destroyed by japan in the battle of chilcheollyang; and after his flotilla's escape, jeolla region, including his primary naval bases, was ravaged by japan. so it's nothing but a glorified escape to begin with.

it's pretty safe to say that the war was all about japan vs china after ming entry (or even from the beginning, as it was meant for an invasion of china in the first place). most of gooks were just being massacred, with exceptions of some volunteers and guerillas that harassed supply lines. funny how gooks always try to trivialize the ming reinforcement. had it not been for them, korea would have been over.

also, we don't give a shit about gook officials' rank to begin with; it's irrelevant, as the armistice was concluded between japan and china, not its vassal, not to mention the fact the king of korea had to send tributes to the shogunate whenever the shogun was succeeded, not the other way around :^)

Attached: imjin conquest.png (741x1013, 778K)

nice damage control. however, baekje was also bound to send their princes to yamato as hostages, as well as tributes to curry favor with us. and this was a unilateral duty, so, i'd say it was a thinly-veiled vassalization. in fact the chronicles of japan (on which gooks' claims that they introduced nice stuff to japan are usually based) refer to them as practical vassals.

Why do netouyos shit up threads that don't have anything to do with them?

Attached: 741b47f2.jpg (798x1440, 334K)

>japan steamrolled and conquered literally the ENTIRE korea within WEEKS
nope. you're an idiot. if japan conquered korea then korea wouldn't exist today. go check for yourself how many cities japs conquered compared to how many cities weren't conquered

>the SOLE reason why japan retreated from pyonyang after this lightning conquest was the ming reinforcement which pushed back the vanguard which was in food shortage due to this fast advance in pyongyang
ming didn't fight the japs at pyongyang you idiot. they accepted a truce by the japs to allow the japs to return south so the ming didn't have to fight them. the koreans told the ming to fight after the righteous armies cut off jap supplies but chinks are too cowardly

>korea itself had no capability to retake it by themselves, nor could they defeat japanese armies in the field, except for those temporal successes (with extremely padded numbers as usual) during some irrelevant sieges, omitting aftermath or big picture
you're severely in denial that korea has evidently btfo the japs. every historian agrees that korea decisively won the war

>The Japanese returned the next summer and burned Jinju to the ground
yeah it took 90,000 jap soldiers vs 4,000 koreans and it took them 6 days. lel

>not only was it a meme hyped in a book made by the posterity to idolize yi, based solely on his padded personal reports, but gooks usually omit the very fact that his 13 ships...
wrong, there's documents from every side that corresponds to the numbers. if there was such a discrepancy then the japs would bitch about it like you're doing now. all you're doing is quoting some random retard with no knowledge of history and doesn't provide sources

>it's pretty safe to say that the war was all about japan vs china after ming entry (or even from the beginning, as it was meant for an invasion of china in the first place). most of gooks were just being massacred, with exceptions of some volunteers and guerillas that harassed supply lines. funny how gooks always try to trivialize the ming reinforcement. had it not been for them, korea would have been over.
maybe you're just a stupid chink. chinese generals took bribes and lost battles despite many of them being fought with overwhelming numbers in their favor. chinks can't into warfare

battle of salsu:
300,000 chinks
10,000 koreans
korean victory

and their ships in the imjin war, like jap ships, couldn't load cannons because they were so weak and couldn't handle the recoil from firing cannons on board

>irrelevant, as the armistice was concluded between japan and china, not its vassal, not to mention the fact the king of korea had to send tributes to the shogunate whenever the shogun was succeeded, not the other way around
false, but of course you're a dumbass and just saying dumb shit