Which Dilbert episode is the most persuasive?

Which Dilbert episode is the most persuasive?

Other urls found in this thread:

youtu.be/wISs5vEIej8
myredditnudes.com/
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

>it's the Science Bitch argument from Always Sunny

Why does his tie always have a boner?

Because you wouldn't remember his character design otherwise
your brain's been persuaded

...

youtu.be/wISs5vEIej8 Cool

The one where he disproves evolution.

The one with Stone Cold

Finding out that the dude behind Dilbert is an MRA was weird.

Really shouldn't be the evidence is all over his work

>Really shouldn't be the evidence is all over his work

*Really shouldn't be, the evidence is all over his work.

...

>writing about established techniques to influence people and how trump uses them makes you an MRA
???

...

Confirmed for not seeing his online spiels about how hard it is being a male and how women have all the power.

...

Taking your word at face value, how does that make him an MRA? Is it somehow offensive to say that women aren't as persecuted as some of them claim to be?

Huh, guess these ones never made it to the Sunday funnies.

>how does that make him an MRA?

Confirmed for not knowing what MRA's truly are.

Are you suggesting that anyone who thinks men are disadvantaged in any way is an MRA?

Saying women don't have it that bad is one thing, but saying they have it easier than men and men are more oppressed is just whiny MRA faggotry.

But if he provides an argument to support his assertion, who are you to disregard his opinion with a derogatory label? That makes you no better than the people who wine SJW whenever someone says women face challenges

Apparently you have a shitty funnies section, all of those have been in mine.

youtu.be/wISs5vEIej8 Weird though how that was worded when that happened

Scott Adams only backed Trump after being bullied by the liberal media. He'll go back to being a flip-flopping beta male after the election.

He's backed all 3 of the main candidates at different points, his endorsement is really more of a joke than anything

>But if he provides an argument to support his assertion

His argument was archaic and flimsy "having to hold doors open for women, having to pay for them, yet they get to decide sex, etc." rhetoric that is patently untrue.

Most of his arguments involve setting up elaborate rhetorical scenarios and then going "lol I troll u!" when people call him on it.

These aren't MRA at all. It's just lovable loser shit

It's like saying Charles Schultz was MRA because Lucy was a raving cunt

Charles Schultz would be MRA he has stated he has a love/hate relationship about women, also look at his early works, the guy really felt like women held all the power in his life

No, dumdum, I'm talking about the articles he wrote on his site before deleting them because he's a beta.

Sure you were.

What kind of weak argument is this? user even said what they were referring to here

wat

And?

Apparently Adams addressed manspreading like twenty years before people even came up with that term and started making a fuss over it.