>writes child porn
>gets away with it cause "lmao dumbpf is a nigger"
Writes child porn
Other urls found in this thread:
yep
it ripped off a brazilian book
it also sucks btw
Fuck off retard
How old is the girl? Because underage girls are sucking cock left and right nowadays.
Delete this, I liked when I read it as a kid. I also played Pedro Baia in a school play once.
To be honest I do think child murder is worse in a strictly realistic sense.
Kids having sex with kids happens all the fucking time and is natural for the most part
The part that the author seems too stupid to understand is that it's the fact Stephen King is writing a detailed painfully long description of children having sex which is the thing that is disturbing people
Found the triggered cat lady
And meanwhile you're just shitposting on Sup Forums while jerking off to child porn
>>writes child porn
literally nothing wrong with it
I didn't read the book, but to the author's credit, it's a horror novel, so it's supposed to be disturbing, I think.
>I can't believe you're all fine when the evil clown monster does evil things, but get all offended with the six 11-year-old boy protagonists take turns having sex with the 11-year-old girl protagonist!
>Kids having sex with kids happens all the fucking time and is natural for the most part
It's a orgy. That's not natural.
t. virgin
It's a book about children getting murdered. That is the point of the book, not some dumb half assed thrown in child orgy. king only threw that in to pleasure his sickness
I had my first orgy with friends when i was 12, i don't think it's that weird.
Kids do have orgys though. I had one when I was like 9 years old.
hes right drumpf fuckin sucks
ffs I remember reading the book as a teen. It's weird, but more like in an esoteric way. Who the fuck cares.
Proof ?
When he was writing "IT" back in the 80's he was totally doing it just to troll Drumpf fans in 30 years. He knew exactly what he was doing.
Yeah man I totally agree lets arrest people for writing things I mean what's the worst that could happen haha
first gay orgy at 13, I need to go back
Masturbating with friends while looking at a porn mag isn't an orgy. Gangbanging one little girl isn't normal anywhere in the world. Not even in the middle east.
It was no gangbang. It was a train.
Stephen King is a pedo-baiter. He has probably saved countless lives by writing that stuff.
Oh yeah, the autistic reply-it-all can't read or comprehend the problem. Kys.
>when you do a shit ton of coke in the '80s and forget why you wrote a child gangbang in your book and then have to try to defend it 30 years later
King was raped as a kid
The sex scene is about children discovering sex the natural way instead of having their innocence raped away from them. Illiterate fags please leave
>being this madly autistic
lmao
>read a book that's supposed to be disturbing
>get disturbed by it
wooooOW
I can believe it, guy gets molested and turns to his writings for solace
What did they mean by this?
Oh, I guess child orgies are okay now.
You obviously had a shitty childhood
A healthy one.
some american soldiers would beg to differ
>healthy
says the autistic
lmao
Yea, I mean he's never come out and said it, but most of his writing around that time is based on his own demons.
The Shining was about his alcholism ( Pretty sure the main character hurt his kid in that one while drunk, which would be another fucked up thing to happen to a kid in his books which furthers my point)
Misery was about his drug addiction
It was (probably) about his childhood abuse.
...
Really makes you think.
Yeah, the healthy thing is to boast about degeneracy on an anonymous board.
>I didn't get laid in middle school boo hoo fuck you king your writing is too dirty 4 me make me feel so mad because I was bullied waaaah
it's fiction, who fucking cares
...
>now
You mean 1986?
Having sex with people your age is not degeneracy retard
The framing is the problem. Killing children is portrayed as bad, an in depth gangbang is portrayed as a necessary "evil" if you could even say it's evil
>healthy
keeps ranting in a thai basket weaving forum
lmao ffuckin autistic kek
Having sex is normal. Participating on a gangbang is degeneracy and borderline faggotry.
>having sex outside of marriage
>not degenerate
Its portrayed as children naturally discovering sex innocently
As opposed to being raped
Innocence is the theme of the book retard
This. For the last time, it wasn't a fucking orgy.
>Innocence
>6 dudes running train on a girl
Stephen, just stop
b-but pizzagate!
Taking turns on a girl, cumming everywhere is not innocently exploring you fucking pedophile, degenerate piece of shit fag enabler.
Sup Forumsfags please leave
This is just what happens during childhood, and this book is about the very real things that children experience
If you're too much of a pussy to handle that why did you even pick it up.
>children discovering sex the natural way
Uh, I'd say losing your virginity in front of your buddies, lost in the depths in a sewer system after beating the shit out of a cosmic horror is not what I would consider "natural way".
Its literally one paragraph that is barely descriptive at all
Did you even read the book
>This is just what happens
My fucking sides
Wasn't a ganbang.
Orgy = everyone having sex at once
Ganbang = multiple guys at the same time
The way it happened in the book was neither of those things.
he's probably embellishing it with his own pedophillic imagination desu
FODA-SE, BRASIL!
>fuck me or you die
>innocence
>writes
>child porn
I wonder how many heads this has gone over.
Usually female kids are more sexually active than boys so yes this is a realistic example (sort of)
And it doesn't even matter, what matters is the intent behind the scene itself, and that is king working through his own personal demons. Theres nothing sexual about it.
>What? A writer using his artform to deal with childhood trauma? FUck yOuuu
>mfw bbc starts normalizing paedos
"He is invariably polite and keen to highlight his intelligence. He mentions that he went to a good university and talks about compliments from his boss.
But it's clear he is not a naturally confident person and doesn't find it comfortable speaking to a journalist. He even gets nervous about dealing with public transport.
I should say now I am very introverted etc, so at least half the problem isn't me actually trusting you, it's me actually having the courage to meet a stranger to talk to.
Was he ever tempted to act on his attraction during puberty?
"I was too shy to do anything, anyway, with anyone. Even if I wasn't a paedophile."
which one of you was adam?
Plebs are tiresome. The book is a horror masterpiece and one of his few truly good novels.
>Did you even read the book
Sup Forumscucks don't read anything other than sensationalist headlines
I'm not saying I'm disturbed by it or offended, I'm saying that's why other people are.
The article is basically the guy going "Why are people shocked or grossed out by the child orgy when there's all this child murder?" which is retarded. People expect child murder from a horror book, they don't expect a coked up Stephen King pedo fantasy.
I mean
Yea this doea happen, pretty often actually. Denying the fact that kids have sex is the equivalent to cover your ears and screaming "bla bla bla I can't hear youu"
Its not even about the sex, its about not being raped.
>People expect child murder from a horror book, they don't expect a coked up Stephen King pedo fantasy.
Exactly. Which is stupid.
>IT WASNT A GANGBANG GUISE
Take a dictionary, several dictionaries both physical and online, and search for the word "Gangbang". The definition is always one person having sex with more than one partner, either taking turns or several at once.
>I didn't expect a personal piece about childhood rape to have a sex scene grrr im madd
You've never read the book if you think that.
A child innocently discovering sex doesn't do shit that a pornstar would do. "Ok guys take turns running a train on me. Oh my god Ben you're so Big! Will it even fit?" It's clearly Stephen writing some sort of fantasy or living vicariously through his work by writing the fantasy way that he wished he had lost his virginity.
>he didnt defeat an ancient evil and then gangbang his friend in a sewer
wew lad your childhood was SHIT
>Theres nothing sexual about sex
>Thinking you have to have a boner to write about sex
Either way this is just typical Sup Forums shit. Read a fucking book for once. That part gets posted in threads all the time and if you faggots would actually read it, you'll find out that it's very tame.
By the time I read the child orgy stuff the book depressed me so bad that I didn't care.
>thinking a sex scene has to be erotic and just about lust
Jesus christ read a fucking book
Requesting the passage where this CP is written in the novel?
Kids having sex, of course it happens.
But there is nothing innocent and natural about kids losing their virginities in a gangbang, that's the point.
>He was just writing a fantasy about how he wished he lost his virginity
Considering he was probably sexually abused a kid, I would want my first time to go differently too
To add on to this, it's fine for Stephen to do that if he wants to, whatever, he can write what he wants to. more power to him for dealing with his childhood trauma or whatever it is he was doing. But that doesn't make it not extremely uncomfortable for everyone else to read
Maybe in context it's fine and he had his reasons, but it still feeds gross and weird to read about little kids fucking each other
Yea I agree, see
Can you imagine being so immature that you can't deal with something disturbing enough to take a message from it.
...
I remember when I was a kid, young teens, bunch of us stood round while some local girl showed everyone her bald teen cunny. Then one of the lads took her in some bushes and stuff happened. Interestingly, that lad years later as an adult got done for fingering his preteen step-sister. No real point to the story, but considering how naive I was back then in comparidon to others, that could have got gangbang real easy in hindsight.
I'm sorry the book about child murder didn't come with a trigger warning.
how would these people react to Lolita if it came out now
Damn.
It's not even that hardcore. Fifty shades of grey was more expressive.
>it's a triggered Kekistani thread
>again
>two wrongs make a right, the argument
...
wtf I love Trump now
shadilay praise kek
How can you write cp? They aren't real kids moral fag. What the fuck has happened to this place. I thought the alt right weren't supposed to be no fun assholes like normal conservatards.