Yes well done harry well done

Yes well done harry well done

HOWEVER

500 points to SNEED

dull

wait wait, let me get this strait. Ok, jk Rowlings explanation was literally just heaven and hell from the Bible?

>he don lots BAD stuff but he pay for it in da afterlife his soul is a baby

what the fuck was this scene anyway
these movies are like a fever dream to me

Yes. Isn't it quaint and naive in a sort of sugary way?

"No!"

He ended up like that because he split his soul too many times with Horcruxes.

IT GOES ON AND ON AND ON

IT'S HEAVEN AND HELL

>die
>well done
Not a totally mindless post, but it doesn't work. Try again.

I like to imagine him saying the well done bit before he dies, then he says however and harry dies and wakes up in heaven.

Would work better in video format.

Huh? How would that work? When Harry dies, Voldemort has basically won by that point.

No, it's just part of D's plan

>Fanfiction guy will never ever post his pastebin again

Harry sacrificed himself so Dumble is like well done harry well done for being so brave HOWEVER and brings him back to life

>Harry sacrificed himself
Okay. It still doesn't make sense to me be because everything is still fucked, but whatever, I don't even remember the context in which Harry dies, so I'm not going to push it.

HOWEVER, you're still merely another uninspired aspect of one of the dullest franchises in the history of movie franchises. Each episode following the boy wizard and his pals from Hogwarts Academy as they fight assorted villains has been indistinguishable from the others. Aside from the gloomy imagery, the series’ only consistency has been its lack of excitement and ineffective use of special effects, all to make magic unmagical, to make action seem inert.

Perhaps the die was cast when Rowling vetoed the idea of Spielberg directing the series; she made sure the series would never be mistaken for a work of art that meant anything to anybody?just ridiculously profitable cross-promotion for her books. The Harry Potter series might be anti-Christian (or not), but it’s certainly the anti-James Bond series in its refusal of wonder, beauty and excitement. No one wants to face that fact. Now, thankfully, they no longer have to.

>a-at least the books were good though
"No!"
The writing is dreadful; the book was terrible. As I read, I noticed that every time a character went for a walk, the author wrote instead that the character "stretched his legs."

I began marking on the back of an envelope every time that phrase was repeated. I stopped only after I had marked the envelope several dozen times. I was incredulous. Rowling's mind is so governed by cliches and dead metaphors that she has no other style of writing. Later I read a lavish, loving review of Harry Potter by the same Stephen King. He wrote something to the effect of, "If these kids are reading Harry Potter at 11 or 12, then when they get older they will go on to read Stephen King." And he was quite right. He was not being ironic. When you read "Harry Potter" you are, in fact, trained to read Stephen King.

Based "No!" poster

>Harry didn't romance Fleur
>Harry didn't take the sorting hat as a best friend
>Harry didn't destroy krum in a duel
>Harry didn't kill barty crouch jr disguised as moody

Dio can you hear me? I am lost and so alone. I'm asking for your guidance. Would you come down from your throne?

So did JK already know Half of Voldermort was inside Harry from the beginning or did she just shit it out somwhere on the way?

>Ayn Rand god tier
>Kafka only middle tier

shit list

really gotta take gab and atlas out of god-tier for this to not immediately be obvious bait

I HEAR YOU BRAVE YOUNG JABLES

YOU ARE HUNGRY FOR THE ROCK

BUT TO LEARN THE ANCIENT METHODS

SACRED DOORS YOU MUST UNLOCK

she says she planned the whole thing out from the beginning

I'm tempted to believe her since she loves Chekov guns so much

The whole parseltongue thing in book 2 came from Tom's soul fragment inside Harry.

Absolutely meaningless, just because Rowling was able to take elements of the first three books and work them into Dumbledore/Voldemort's keikakku, doesn't mean she had it planned. Stuff like that and the diary being a horcrux and Shape loving Harry the whole time! was just lucky

You can say that but it's a fact that she presented the parseltongue talent as unique to the "heir of slytherin" which is why people made such a big deal of it in book 2. Obviously the actual heir to Slytherin is Tom. It would be a weird quirk to give Harry without the explanation that it's really Tom's bit inside him.

Snape loved Harry's mom, that's a pretty serious distinction. It explains why he's constantly bitter around Harry but still feels invested enough to help out with Dumbledore's 4d chess game in his own way.

HOLY DIVER

YOU'VE BEEN DOWM TOO LONG IN THE MIDNIGHT SEA

OH WHAT'S BECOMING OF ME