Shooting to kill

Do you shoot to kill, disable, impare, or scare?
I shoot to kill and I was wondering if that's too harsh, everytime I bring it up people call me awful and gasp. It seems normal to me, am I wrong?
No "gunz iz buad gunz do da kil, we wuz kangz" garbage. I want a serious discussion please.

You obviously have never taken a self defense course, there is no shooting to injure.

Shoot to kill or you will be sued/arrested

I know there is no shoot to injure but I was wondering why shooting to kill seems so awful if that's my only option

If the one you shoot at intends to kill you then shoot to kill. If they are running away shoot in leg. If she's talking too much shoot in mouth, but not with gun.

If someone is trying to injure, rape, etc you end their lives with extreme prejudice.

It's not awful. You have a right to defend yourself.

To kill since trying to aim at someone's arm or leg would probably result in you missing and hitting some bystander.

>If they are running away shoot in leg

Flag.

Sage.

Get out.

Shoot until the threat is neutralized in self defense. If you're using it and there's no justification to kill the person you aren't supposed to be using your gun.