Daily reminder that Chad always wins
Daily reminder that Chad always wins
What were those Russian guys called again? Ding Dong?
Durmstrang... and I think they were Bulgarian or some shit
>MUH Yellow fever
Asian women all look the same to me unless they're heavily mixed. Chad can have her.
It's actually in Scandinavia.
As I understand:
Beauxbaton is Western and Southern Europe
Durmstrang is Eastern an Northern Europe
Hogwarts is Britain and Ireland.
cho chang was an irish native
Why does asian girls like white guys so much? Very annoying. I'm starting to hate white guys.
Robert pattinson is an ugly mofo
>Why do asian girls like white guys so much?
I dunno but thank God for that
But he died, to fucking Wormtail.
Scottish. That brogue was a total turn-off
t. whyte piggu
>spineless self hating asian woman and predatory loser white boy
truly the most embarassing pairing
BIG
krum is bulgarian but the school is somewhere in the far north and takes people from countries like germany and russia
fine hips, shapely legs, superb waist, and an admirable bust
I dont get the appeal of asians in general. Black soulless eyes and baboon like faces
Also it's dudes-only. sucks to be a Slav
t. whitegurl
Id take a thin asian girl over a chubby white girl but thin white girl over thin asian girl hands down
No he's correct, it's Bulgarian
>pic
Oh boy those delicious salty coping posts and self-delusion
You're deranged!
i read a fic where harry potter was a girl and she was getting pounded by voldemort every night really top notch
Chadric Diggory
Self-loathing happas have no excuse for being pussies.
The #1 P4P boxer is a WMAF happa
Oh shit this is Harry Potter? I thought this was a shill image for a new movie. I'd feel bad for not remembering but it's easy to forget the dullest franchise in the history of movie franchises. Each episode following the boy wizard and his pals from Hogwarts Academy as they fight assorted villains has been indistinguishable from the others. Aside from the gloomy imagery, the series’ only consistency has been its lack of excitement and ineffective use of special effects, all to make magic unmagical, to make action seem inert.
Perhaps the die was cast when Rowling vetoed the idea of Spielberg directing the series; she made sure the series would never be mistaken for a work of art that meant anything to anybody, just ridiculously profitable cross-promotion for her books. The Harry Potter series might be anti-Christian (or not), but it’s certainly the anti-James Bond series in its refusal of wonder, beauty and excitement. No one wants to face that fact. Now, thankfully, they no longer have to.
>a-at least the books were good though
"No!"
The writing is dreadful; the book was terrible. As I read, I noticed that every time a character went for a walk, the author wrote instead that the character "stretched his legs."
I began marking on the back of an envelope every time that phrase was repeated. I stopped only after I had marked the envelope several dozen times. I was incredulous. Rowling's mind is so governed by cliches and dead metaphors that she has no other style of writing. Later I read a lavish, loving review of Harry Potter by the same Stephen King. He wrote something to the effect of, "If these kids are reading Harry Potter at 11 or 12, then when they get older they will go on to read Stephen King." And he was quite right. He was not being ironic. When you read "Harry Potter" you are, in fact, trained to read Stephen King.