Translation: solicit changed as per usual, Rich makes believes a reasoning behind it as clickbait

Translation: solicit changed as per usual, Rich makes believes a reasoning behind it as clickbait

Other urls found in this thread:

gamesnosh.com/fez-investors-outed-judges-2011-igf-award/
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

>giving in so easily
weak pussies

What about cases where the "bigoted speaker" isn't really bigoted at all, but the angry mob attacks him anyway?

Can we finally get Sup Forums off our board now

>Sup Forums

Yeah man, fucking bleedingcool Nazi mother fuckers

If the left doesn't agree with you, then you are a bigot. Period. No exceptions.

I mean in the context of comics getting less political, will that stop /poltv/ from reading one out of context line and getting triggered here?

He's right you know

Serious talk, why isn't THIS a Civil War plot instead of what we got instead?

Heroes tearing each other apart over petty politics, even endangering citizens who don't agree with them and the consequences basically involve the citizens losing their faith in them.

What? A differing viewpoint? Well I'm not a nazi so that means you must be one. I'd punch you right in your bigoted face.

because spencer did a one off issue about falcon having to protect some fox news type lady from sjws

Considering what's happening atm to Jontron, Markiplier and Pew Die Pie, he's not wrong.

*tips pussyhat

Don't forget ANTIFA (and no, what the useful branch did in the past =/ what they do today)

What's happening with them?

>he deserves everything he gets
I guess so. How many millions of dollars do you make talking into a camera?

>no one here actually believes that.

Keep telling yourself that

Markiplier chose to defend him, (or at least, try to be a mediator) because regardless of what you think of Ped Die Pie, WSJ's attack on him IS unaccounted for, slandering him for a joke, THEN having the gall to ask for his opinions on his doorstep for a chance to "defend himself"

PewDiePie made some anti-semetic jokes in a few of his videos or something so Disney dropped their sponsorship of him and some others are following suit. I imagine something similar with Jon and Mark.

>show me one person who says those things who isn't obviously shitposting

Not worth my time. You would assume they were shit posting anyway

>and pew die pie made an indians guy write death to all jews and film it so he could laugh

So? Just a bit of banter

This is what I meant. You're completely biased. You're the exact type of person was complaining about

Yes but unfunny =/ anti-semitic. He should be booed for it, NOT slandered for it. Also, guys like Moviebob, Andrew Sobson, and the Channel Awesome folks are seething in anger that they're not getting punished ENOUGH for it.

Jack has made some comments as well as it's expected as he's friends with both of them.

Best to all handling this nonsense.

Yes, but that's just Falcon vs a bunch of nobodies. I'm talking actual heroes fighting each other over petty politics until they realised what they did wrong.

And if the right doesn't agree with you, you're a subhuman menace. Period. No exceptions.


Same shit, different side. This country is fucked because it treats politics like its a fucking football game.

Nah especially in this case they're removing a story about the trinity defending a bigot from getting beat up for his opinions, you know that thing they're always salty about.

you moderates are the worst. pick a side you holier than thou jerk

Nice the worst of the bunch bitching they can't destroy more people.

Fucking Spoony all over again. Cept none of these folks have diagnosed mental health issues so hope it all goes well for them.

Does Nick get paid to comment on literally everything DC does

I mean he's not wrong, they shouldn't get scrapped. One would just hope the companies/writers actually got fatigued and just didn't make the stories.

Yeah but I don't see people on the far right trying to get others fired over their beliefs. Far left SJW fascists take things too far.

I feel it should worry him more that they constantly want to straight up soapbox instead of writing a good book.

the far right just wants to fire you if you are gay

This is hilarious. He's like that guy who shows up on every DCEU thread trying to say the movies flopped. Maybe it IS him!

>I mean he's not wrong, they shouldn't get scrapped
Really, yeah they should. Everyone is sick of this shit. Why would you go out of your way to torture your audience? They could at least be more subtle, rather than clobbering us over the head with their opinions constantly.

Sup Forums's trying these days, and they're motivated because the far left SJWs did it. Atm, they're limiting their targets to SJWs who do it to others, but who knows how long THAT will last. Power corrupts, after all.

Why would Nick Spencer be upset with soapboxing?

Been that way for years now. The system works and they are formally delt with. BUT THAT ISN'T ENOUGH. According to them.

>They could at least be more subtle

The Deathstroke gun violence issue was good.

Too bad the government won't let them do that. They might want to, but leftists actually get to implement their wishes. Personally I don't think anyone should be fired for their political views. Who cares if a guy posts on a neo nazi website as long as he makes good burgers?

What faggot got fired for being gay?

>Too bad the government won't let them do that.
it will actually. states like ohio you can be fired for being gay

Really? How did they manage to get away with that? Does it depend on the job or something?

Who cares if someone wants to fire someone for being a neo nazi? That's freedom too. Also how fucking delusional can you be to not see how hard the right fights for their legal right to discriminate.

And horse theft is technically still punishible by death in Texas

meant for

>Yeah but I don't see people on the far right trying to get others fired over their beliefs

If you're being serious, thanks for the comedy

>If you don't agree with one of two ludicrous extremes you're a spineless fence-sitter

American politics in a nutshell.

Because it's not about THEM, it's about the ones who are labeled as THEM getting caught in the crossfire and that's gone too far.

1) Hero vs. hero battles are dumb.
2) Even ignoring the first point, Marvel wouldn't have the guts to pull something like that off, despite it being a good idea.

Would be great for an imaginary story, if Marvel does things like that. Whatever happened to imaginary stories anyway?

it's less getting away with it, and more no anti-discrimination against gay/trans people. some states and companies have those. some don't

I don't know if Gamergate is alt-right, but I suspect there is some overlap, but they were pretty hardcore with the attempts to get people fired, on top of the doxxing, death and rape threats.

Hey! You try to deal with your horses being stolen every week and tell me that isn't justified.

Sup Forums cant into self introspection

jesus are you star labs or the arrowcave

Er, they are absolutely alt-right

I'm glad it was scrapped it sounds like PSA tier shit. A bigoted speaker doesn't need Superman, Batman and Wonder Woman to protect him. Just the one is fine but all three is over kill.

This type of story is much better suited to Green Arrow

>I don't know if Gamergate is alt-right

It's not

You're right about the first if we're talking about established heroes. They should be ABOVE that sort of shit. However, it's a great idea if you're doing a story about a starter hero trying to make a name for himself in a world where the supposed protectors of the city have failed because of petty squabbles.

Basically, a scenario like "The Tick"

How? What was all of that about anyway? I only remember something about not liking some subpar game and that was sexist or something.

which is it

That's because they're not popular anymore.
Even though I hate it, I can't support that censorship. If they did it of their own accord after listening to criticism/worked on their shit it's fine but removing a finished story because you don't want the content getting out is bullshit.

Wow tribalism is a huge issue humanity still hasn't conquered. What a unique and new problem. Surely these (((globalist))) hating nationalists are our best solution to the problem.

someone's game got popular and it was revealed it only got good scores because the devoloper slept with 5 guys. it devolved into shitflinging on both sides

>If they did it of their own accord after listening to criticism/worked on their shit it's fine
that's what they did

It technically isn't but most of the idiots still involved with Gamergate are involved in the alt-right even if they're too stupid to realize it. It's the same crowd of armchair activists.

It doesn't matter.
It's from before Alt-Right "became a thing" but people could presume overlap because they're predominantly just an online presence and seem more like a backlash against SJWs atleast in the beginning..

Eventually they uncovered bribed critics or whatever that would give garbage games high reviews, rigged awards, etc. Somehow pointing this out was "misogynistic" because the people doing the rigging and bribing were women.

It's really weird. It started out with a guy who was mad that his girlfriend slept with a game journalist, then spiraled out of control into people being mad about "ethics in gaming journalism" except it was mostly just being mad at people who liked what they didn't like, even if they only imagined that they were liking what they didn't like.

Eh. Rather let 10 guilty men go free than put one innocent man in jail.

Otherwise, you're no different to oh say..Trump.

Because the definition of "neo-nazi" is becoming absurdly broad, it currently comes down to "you voted a candidate different than mine"

You actually believe GG was about rape threats? Or that there were serious threats at? Jesus. The FBI recently even released an archive of their investigations that showed most accusation where exaggerated if not plain lies

Yeah that could work. Maybe use expies like Moore did for Watchmen.

It's not. The story was on dock, and they pulled it.

I would like to clarify one point: the left like to get right winger's get fired because their beliefs offend people or give the company a bad image, Sup Forums has been trying to get people fired who use the PC culture for personal gain or to push an agenda of exclusion: ironically the exact same thing that the left accuses the right of doing.

examples include the college "diversity officer" who was excluding white males from policy input on campus. Ironically, she avoided much trouble and only lost per position as diversity officer.

Flip side of that, a graphic designer in Canada was fired and had his name ruined over a twitter flame war where online leftist activists claimed he did everything from distribute child porn to rape, all without evidence, simply because he corrected their references.

People say "hey, but both sides do it!" but the difference is in the effect. The left are much more successful because their brand of bigotry masquerades as moral justification, and thus its easier for people in positions of power to enforce without losing face.

No they fucking didn't. This story gets more ridiculous the more times you people tell it.

>accusation where exaggerated if not plain lies
On both sides certainly.

Was it ABOUT rape threats? No, I don't think they organized for that specific purpose. But it was absolutely organized harassment.

of their own accord, they didn't want to do this story now

If you consider many people complaining about the same thing "organized harassment" then I GUESS

Kinda true, yeah

>No they fucking didn't.
Literally found this in 2 seconds and I don't even follow Gamergate stuff. Enough with your alternative facts; Gamergate found out a bunch of info.
gamesnosh.com/fez-investors-outed-judges-2011-igf-award/

But Green Arrow doesn't stand for the collective ideals of DC comics.
GA has always been "that liberal loudmouth hypocrite who causes trouble with his politics pushing".
If this was his story the messaging wouldn't be that DC thinks protecting that particular speech is absolutely right and beyond questioning, it would just be a message that DC thinks this is a liberal's values.

Think about it: SUPERMAN, BATMAN, and WONDER WOMAN stand behind this guy's All-American right to say these things over and over again at all those people who don't want to hear it over and over and over again.
It's overt VALIDATION of borderline hatespeech by DC's greatest superheroes.
That's the reason there's internal issues with the creative talent.

It should be a Superman story. Truth, justice, and freedom/American way, you know. Good opportunity for a speech.

Taking a side is throwing money away.

You should actually read that article. Besides, even if that article is right that would be the first actual case of gamegate doing anything that actually fights corruption and even then it all blatantly leads back to their Sup Forums celeb shit and their hatred of certain devs rather than some actual desire to fix something that was always broken.

At the end of the day you shouldn't assign the blame to the rhetoric but the action.
They were advertising it and then they pulled it. I can read it as fear of backlash. I'd just be more comfortable if they went through with it, then they can tone back on politics.

Gamergate was founded on 1) hating women 2) hating progressives

One of it's defining features was so-called absolute support of "free speech and creative expression" while violently opposing free speech and creative expression when those clashed with points #1 and #2

Those are all alt-right 101

hate speech isn't justice, and shouldn't be the american way

Tell the FBI that.

Can I still hate Brianna Wu, since she's a man?

HATE SPEECH ISN'T FREE SPEECH!

Hate speech isn't real you nigger faggot.

...

Hating her is universal. What a fucking awful person.

They'll never admit that their entire crusade was a sham and all they ever really cared about was hating the SJW bogeyman. Don't waste your time.

>Gamergate was founded on 1) hating women 2) hating progressives

>failing to damage control this hard
Gamergate was founded on 1)hating bad games 2) hating people who upvoted bad games for sex and cash

And who makes bad games and people who upvoted bad games for sex and cash?

Zoe Quinn?

The "anti-semetic" jokes in question was that thing where he paid some dudes on Fiverr to hold up a sign saying "Death to All Jews" and paying some dude to dress up as Jesus and say "Hitler did nothing wrong". Both of which are so outlandish it's clearly just something done for shock value comedy. People talk about it as if he went on some Micheal Richards-tier tirade, but it's just typical internet shitposting.

Sad thing is, hew own side will never publicly decry her. That would actually HELP their image more than hurt it if they did that.

Please, GG was founded on Sup Forums riding the dick of some twat who released a hilariously massive and pathetic document on his asshole cheating ex.