Lovecraft

Why I can't find any good lovecraftian movie? I've read all his stories, played Bloodborne and now I just want more and more. Recommend me some kino to watch tonight.

Other urls found in this thread:

change.org/p/the-world-fantasy-award-make-octavia-butler-the-wfa-statue-instead-of-lovecraft
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

Mouth of Madness is kino.
Dagon is a proper B movie, Below is underwater horror from Pitch Black director.

If you think Bloodborne is Lovecraftian you don't understand Lovecraft at all.

How about you fuck off back to you disgusting manchild

Re-Animator
From Beyond

Top tier 80's gorefests, with a shitton of charm.

>I've read all his stories, played Bloodborne
Thats like a pleb crash course of plebness.

Do yourself a favor and at least jump into Thomas Ligotti and True Detective S1.

True detective season 1 was not lovecraftian.

>ITT: retards

Why do you think i rec it to you?

Just don't out yourself as not having read Lovecraft so quickly.

I had read Lovecraft before you were born faggot

I saw Mouth of Madness already. Dagon sounds nice.
It's not strictly Lovecraftian but it's the closes we can get
Fuck off, Sup Forums is my native board
I saw all three parts of Re-Animator. The first one was fucking amazing
Never heard of Ligotti, gotta look that up.

>but it's the closes we can get
If by "we" you mean underage Sup Forumsiggers who can't read.

Dagon and The Resurrected are pretty good. Not a whole lot of Lovecraft movies unfortunately.

But I recommend OP plays Call of Cthulu Dark Corners of the Earth for another good lovecraft game.

>it's so lahvecraftwaan dooode
>read all wkipeedia articool aboot him!

From what I gather Lovecraftian just means adding testicles to shit and Kafkaesque is make something about puberty or some shit.

have a (you)

>From what I gather Lovecraftian just means adding testicles to shit and Kafkaesque is make something about puberty or some shit.

You're a burger, right?

Also pic related. Great special effects but not amazing overall.

I think it would have been way better without the monsters or without being so overtly supernatural. The cult stuff was kind of interesting but having the middle be a weird monster movie gave me whiplash.

Lol

Yes and after the role of a lifetime I've been busy.

>I've read all his stories
did you understand them?
>played Bloodborne
what's the secret of Bloodborne's plot OP?
>now I just want more and more
lol addicted to an aesthetic you don't understand
>recommend some shit
no faggot go read the books again you brainlet scum

You can shitpost but you'll never truly understand proper shitposting.

>ask people for recommendation
>people shit on you
wew lad

The Witch, in the sense that largely unseen forces drive people to insanity.

Maybe you should ask for recommendations for things you actually want instead of being the 10 millionth person to say "lovecraftian" despite clearly not grasping what's unique about Lovecraft as opposed to his contemporaries.

This is the truth why we will never have a movie based on Lovecraft


Lovecraft was a white loser writer who wrote for low-quality magazines.

Nothing he wrote can be compared to works by modern authors.

The only fans of this mediocre are edgy and lonely semi-illiterate boys and racist right-wingers.

> He was a beta that in the whole life only managed to have sex with a woman, for pity.

> He was an affected racist, his hatred of minorities was a shame even at that time

> He was totally devoid of talent,skill and experience, his works were limited to a few pages without a deep narrative and really complex characters, all of them imitations of himself, an incapable, boring and pathetic white male

> It was too anglo, all his work is based on the limited spectrum of the life of an anglo-saxon man.

> Even though he was only focused on this limited racist expectation of an Anglo-Saxon, he was unable to create characters with whom we can identify with ourselves. Even if you are a descendant of Anglo-Saxons, you cannot identify with his racist and poorly educated characters.

> His scientific knowledge was pathetic even for works from the early 20th century. There would be great difficulty in adapting his lack of knowledge to intelligent content for modern audiences.

> Lack of economic and political knowledge. He flirts several times with eugenic and socialist conduct. Had he lived long enough, he would probably be an admirer of Hitler. This lack of knowledge in these issues makes their work become even more outdated and less complex.

> Total lack of subtexts. He probably did not even know what that word means. He also had an extraordinarily poor vocabulary.

In summary, Lovecraft is a lame """"""""""artist"""""""""", his work is incapable of captivating people endowed with education, imagination and taste.


Hollywood understands this and seeks to stay away from the pitiful quality and racism that the name Lovecraft is eternally bound.


Here is an example of the """"""""legacy"""""""" of Lovecraft


change.org/p/the-world-fantasy-award-make-octavia-butler-the-wfa-statue-instead-of-lovecraft

Not even good pasta m8

i too like associating myself with aesthetics and other people's ideas and names. It makes me feel less like I'm inside a giant torture machine. upboat, hope you find you find some KEENO that'll sate that LOVECRAFT BUG YOU CAUGHT user hehe KEK

The Mist