Why was the first one great but the second one sucked dick balls?

?

Other urls found in this thread:

deadline.com/2014/08/sin-city-2-prime-focus-world-namit-maholtra-visual-effects-822967/
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/A_Dame_to_Kill_For
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

You were 14 when you saw the first one.

they tried too hard in the second one. the first one felt sincere.

Because it had comics to copy off of?

Thats true the second one didn't have comics to follow

it was still better than that spin-off The Spirit

deadline.com/2014/08/sin-city-2-prime-focus-world-namit-maholtra-visual-effects-822967/

Because the second one wasn't To Hell and Back.

First one wasnt that great anyway, Nick Stahl was cool though

The first one had Clive Owen.

both are equal in quality

I thought the second one was just as good.

But the sequel had Eva

the first one was a turd, and the second was a bubbling pool of diarrhea. both are shit

Because there was inspiration when they made the first. By the time they finally got around to part 2, Rodriguez had lost it and that moron Miller wanted to bring Nancy back!!!FACT!!!

>First was a legit adaptation made care
>Second was a rush job, looked cheap, no Owen, not relying on Miller's books.

Eh I actually loved the first one, second one suffered because it was conceived in the age of soy but Mickey rourke was still enjoyable

Chill.
It's a movie based on a gritty and unrealistic comic book. It was meant to be an entertaining true-to-form recreation of said comic into a movie. They got the spirit of it right and that's kinda the point, not meant to blow you off your feet; meant to be something for fans of the series.

member the 300 sequel?

>mfw 5 minute sex scene in theater with brother

Is this the proof that Eva Green tits ruin every movie?

Before Robert Rodriguez went full retard with Machete

Sin City 2 is ultimate pleb filter.

They used up all the good stories in the first one.

>Thats true the second one didn't have comics to follow
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/A_Dame_to_Kill_For

story sounds better in the comic, they should have copied it exactly

Na dreamers was good, maybe since her breast augmentation they became poisonous

95% of the sin city comics are good

I am a fan of the series: I own all the first prints of the graphic novels, and all the single issues. the movies were stupid because they were live action. lots of bad acting, bad makeup, miscasting, and it was too silly.

if you're going to adapt sin City, make it an animated film. that's how you stay completely true to the source material. sin City aged like shit

Eva Green's scene's were highly watchable, the rest was drek

The first one was directed by an up and coming filmmaker on the rise. The second was directed by a mentally ill alcoholic cartoonist on the decline.

yeah it's pretty much this. it's godawful on rewatch

What makes Rodriguez & Miller’s effort so awesome is that a character within the framework on the page of a comic moves within the limited environment. He never intended to make total live action film. It definitely makes very interesting cases study film user.

What I want to know is why the second one looked so much worse? Both the CG and practical effects were laughable.

lol this

but also they just waited too long to make the second one.