How do we kill the mouse

...

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=dvaCJCuSiPI&t=1501s
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

let them continue what they do, hope they make avangers inf war as "liked" as SW, so capeshit finally dies

In order to gain a media monopoly they'd need to own the internet. They'll never own the internet. The studio system is set to fail completely in the face of the internet. Disney owning the studio system is akin to one company owning all the horse farms a month before the model T goes into mass production.

Just look at the archives a week ago with all the threads shilling Net Neutrality repeal. Monopolies are the cool edgy contrarian opinion to have now.

>xir thinks monopoly doesn't mean overwhelming market power aswell as one company controlling an industry

aww look at the widdle baby

It is kinda decades too late to really be upset about monopolies. the last one the government tried to break up was microsoft and the result was the creation of an even larger, even more comically evil company.

The point is the market power granted by owning the studio system is draining fast.

Yes and it's being replaced by services like Netflix, which has never made a single good original series or film.

What’s funnier was seeing them say “but this will break up the monopolies and allow competition!” Like Verizon and AT&T are just going to roll over and let other companies move in on their turf

Stop giving him power.

This I mean it's not like they've announced a streaming site or anything

So a service that, quality wise, is on par with the studio system of the last ten years, but is more convenient, is replacing the studio system?

Is that your point?

>millenials
>not liberals
Don't try and lump me with subhumans.

You can't. Too many retards enjoy spending fortunes on overpriced, shitty vacations to Orlando. I have a few in my family and if you question them on why they bother they react as if you just pulled a knife on them and told them to empty their wallets, the contents of which, of course, are the property of the Disney Corporation.

the point is you're so obsessed with muh monopoly fallacies you don't even realize how little Disney can actually control
so they're now in charge of most garbage popculture stuff, so what?
it's not like they're forcing people to pay for said garbage, and if they fail to keep the garbage tasty people will look for other shit to buy, and there isn't a lack of it by any means
this is like building a monopoly on radio stations in the age of television, it's a big nothing

Do you really think that Netflix schlock is on par with a good film produced by a major stuido?

and even if its twice as successful as CBS all access, it's totally irrelevant.

>this is like building a monopoly on radio stations in the age of television, it's a big nothing
Are you seriously that retarded?

I think his point is there hasn't been a good film produced by a major studio in the last decade.

You'd have to go back a fair bit to find a "good major studio" film.

How net neutrality has anything to do with monopolies.

You're a retard
That just sounds like a big case of the butthurts.

You can't. The Mouse always wins

if you're posting nothing of value next time don't even bother responding

US ISPs are five regional monopolies and the fact the internet just doesn't work without network neutrality policies is the only thing keeping them from acting like regional monopolies.

no net neutrality gives monopolies more power

They're paying you aren't they.

>there hasn't been a good "major studio film" in a while
>UR BUTTHURT

your argumentative acumen leaves all opposition decimated.

you can start by not watching their shit within 3 days of release every single time just so that you can tell everyone how much you hate it and pay for the privilege

but you won't do that, so just give up

They already own Hulu. If they could buy up Youtube (which isn't hard, it makes a loss each year), and Netflix, they'd own all major streaming platforms.
A monopoly doesn't literally mean you own everything, it means you own such a disproportional amount of the industry that no one else can hope to compete.

your favorite garbage is now being made by the same garbage makers, how problematic

negro disney is worth 92 billion and google (the people who own youtube) is worth five times that.

Hulu is the most worthless pile of shit in existence and it's still more successful that other attempts at a single-channel/studio streaming service.

>negro disney is worth 92 billion and google (the people who own youtube) is worth five times that.
>durr diss company is worth more dan dis company so dey wud never sell off an asset that loses them money! xD

>people are really worried about disney when apple and google make disney look like fucking nothing

it really boggles the mind

Not only that, it means that they can and are influencing the industry, changing it, molding it they way they want, their competitors will absorb their style, in the future everything will be like the Avengers and the Force awakens.

APOLOGIZE!

That doesn't make any sense, that doesn't stop corporations from making a cartel.

youtube could lose more in a quarter than disney makes in a year and google would barely feel it. This is the difference in size between the entities you're talking about. Google got to where it is by deriving value from something more than the bottom line.

Oh so I guess it's okay for one garbage maker to make all the garbage, instead of having several garbage men making different types of garbage.

I like how, when people don't understand something, they say it doesn't make sense, in order to make their lack of understanding not their fault.

>2017
>not being a millennial
whats wrong with you bruh

don't go pay to see their movies in theaters

...

Media will give me a good Xmen movie.

FOx should've done a better job

>youtube could lose more in a quarter than disney makes in a year and google would barely feel it.
Your entire post can be summed up by "I don't pay the slightest bit of attention to business news"
Google have already considered selling off Youtube. This entire "adpocalypse" shit and Youtube Red has been Google desperately trying to make a profit on their platform by promising advertisers that it's family friendly. I think you've been listening to a few too many keynote speeches if you believe theres a single company out there that isn't interested in their bottom line. If Google doesn't turn Youtube around soon with their adjustments to advertising they are going to sell it off.The question is whether it'll go to Facebook or Disney.

>the internet simply don't work without "net neutrality" so monopolies will only form now

context to this?

STOP BUYING SHIT

this is what we voted for, and we vote with our wallets. stop supporting them. it'll take millions of people to make a difference but it starts with us

they planted a bomb in his head set to go off if he criticized nu-wars

>The point is...DURRRRR WUUUUURP BLEEP BLOP BING BONG

This.

Blade Runner 2049 was good

Mark Hamill trying to stand for the fans and being crushed by Rian "Childhood Destroyer" Johnson

You're confusing the title II reclassification for network neutrality.

You also can't read, thus somehow interpreted to mean "monopolies will form without network neutrality." When it clearly states there already are five regional monopolies and network neutrality policies (read: ISPs not controlling content) is the only thing keeping them from acting like what they already are.

Seriously. I don’t get how half this board can talk shit about Disney but then there’s tons of people on here outright admitting they paid a ticket to see something they knew they’d hate. People are hypocrites

not the same guy but source?

Google's business model is, was, always will be, "get people to use thing then sell information." Their issue is the value of information that can be derived from youtube, not the fact it costs money.

Not to mention their attempts to turn it into netflix clone, but between netflix, amazon, and hulu, that markets already saturated. Which makes your assertion that disney might buy youtube all the more ridiculous.

And them being able to control what content they can sell doesn't make any sense on why they couldn't make a cartel already.

YouTube is too powerful of a metadata gathering service for Google to abandon

From one of his and Rian's recent interviews

>Their issue is the value of information that can be derived from youtube, not the fact it costs money.
You're a fucking moron. Youtube doesn't make a profit, and it needs to. Google hold this opinion, why are they suddenly introducing paid subscriptions to Youtube Red and encouraging advertisers if selling info was profitable enough?

Is English your first language?

Public lynchings

They are normalfags from redit and Sup Forums.

They. Already. Are. Monopoly/cartel. Network neutrality keeps them from acting like it.

>he thinks disney is going to buy a second streaming platform
>he calls others names

...

No.

>they already were
>but net neutrality kept it from happening
What. In. The Fuck.
And monopoly and cartels ain't the same thing.

I assumed you had to be using the terms interchangeably because your terrible english (both comprehension and expression) is making it impossible to understand precisely where your lack of understanding is on this issue.

And the fact you're talking about cartels for some reason makes it even more confusing. It's like you're just spouting random words at this point.

Net Neutrality kills smaller ISP start-ups, ensuring those ISPs already in power stay in the power.

>he thinks disney is going to buy a second streaming platform
>he thinks Disney isn't interested in a monopoly
They only have Hulu now because it was a convenient addition in their deal with Fox. Once they're raking in money on the expanded universe Spiderman, Xmen, Deadpool, Avengers crossovers, they will absolutely buy up Netflix because it's easily outcompeting Hulu.

youtube.com/watch?v=dvaCJCuSiPI&t=1501s
23:00 mark

ISP start-up (and small ISP) is a contradiction in terms, in the US. The capital needed to lay line anywhere is in the hundreds of millions.

Not to mention network neutrality is the only way a "small ISP" would have any ability to deliver content. Because it means that ISP's competition can't throttle/block whatever traffic needs to cross their networks.

So seriously, fuck off with this total bullshit about "small ISPs."

BY DEPORTING EVERY NIGGER, JEW AND FUCKING MUZZIE BACK TO THE FUCKING SHITHOLES THEY CAME FROM

With NaziPorgs

So how is a tiny company like disney going to gain a monopoly over the internet when every tech company is five times their size?

>Marvel and Star Wars

Lmao no one cares. I love that the fox deal is what scared people. Not ABC not ESPN not any of the hundreds of other properties they own, but fucking Fox media.

Oh, alright then, now try to explain how they already acted like that with net neutrality act but net neutrality prevented them from acting like that.

>spouting random words
Monopoly: Merged/bought companies.
Cartel: Different companies acting together for mutual benefit.

>FF is a stone

no

Net Neutrality isn't just "you can't throttle anything"; there's numerous regulations, required for any ISP, that are expensive to implement and maintain. Plus, smaller ISPs being able to throttle bandwidth hogs like Netflix increases service quality for everyone else.

>By the early 1980s, the parks were generating 70% of Disney's income

the mouse was nearly done in the 80s, but the parks helped them through the 80s, and by the end of the 80s, they started making quality films starting with Little Mermaid and they finally started making cartoons on tv with ducktales and all that crap

I also remember that the 00s were hard for disney. I mean, they had pixar films, but if you exclude pixar films, you're left with garbage films like Chicken Little, Home on the Range, some of the biggest flops in disney's career. But mouse is swallowing more and more companies. I think the biggest challenge disney will face is themselves. Soon their products will compete with each other. They have too much shit on their hands

>but you won't do that
I really hate this dumb argument
Do you think anyone here watched Beauty and the Beast in theater?
It's still the highest grossing film of 2017. Sup Forums is not that relevant.

Again, you're confusing the title II reclassification for network neutrality. The title II reclassification was simply legislation enforcing/requiring network neutrality. The repeal does not remove the necessity of network neutrality for the internet to function. Since the US ISPs are so large they think they have sufficient subscribers in their captive markets to go non-neutral and double and triple charge both content creators and their subscribers to get back to what the internet is right now. They also want to be able turn all their infrastructure into toll-ways for any traffic coming to/from any other ISP.

if the internet is like a bunch of roads, network neutrality is saying the people who own the roads can't dictate who can drive on them. The same rules need to apply to everyone, no matter who drives more/less on the roads.

If you don't understand this post completely don't bother responding you non-english-speaking fuck.

>a tiny company like disney
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

YOU'RE CONFUSING THE TITLE II RECLASSIFICATION FOR NETWORK NEUTRALITY

network neutrality is just "all data treated equally." The title II reclassification is pretty complicated but, fundamentally, all it was doing was putting into law, "treat data equally."

Son, disney only looks big because of the size of the ever shrinking sandbox that is the studio system. It's fucking nothing compared to any of the ISPs. Fucking UPS is bigger than disney.

yeah, no shit, the average Sup Forums user isn't the target audience for beauty and the beast, but it is the target for capeshit and star wars.

and as a wider demographic (i.e. beyond Sup Forums) they are weirdly obsessed with these fucking franchises to the point where they're just happy to have something to shit on/talk about, and whether the content is good or not doesn't really change whether they'll spend their money. it's like an addiction

I'm sure if you browse Sup Forums you're aware of the last jedi's low rt score. how many of those people who disliked it will still watch the next one? probably the overwhelming majority

don't worry senpai, I got you. i'll end the mousy menace once and for all

They have a monopoly on Marvel properties?

Oh, and Star Wars.

Disney is 52 on the Fortune 500 list you fucking retard.
Do you think being the 52nd richest company on the planet is "small"? If there are 500 companies worth listing as the richest in the world, and you have more money than 448 of them are you small?

You just describe functioning aspects of internet services completely arbitrary to more monopolization.

A monopoly on American capeshit movie rights, is a monopoly on media?
I guess. But a very specific aspect of media.

Ya realize that doesn't even put them in the top 10%, right? The top 10% is several times larger than the bottom 90%. Then the top 1% is several times larger than the bottom 99%.

I understand these are difficult concepts to follow for an autistic person upset that everything at TV time will be disney.

Fortune 500 has been deprecated since the 80's. If you're not top 50 your nothing.

The issue is the ISPs ALREADY ARE monopolies in their respective regions. Network neutrality is blocking monopolistic activities.

To keep with the (clumsy and barely accurate) road metaphor, network neutrality is keeping the people who own all the roads in the middle of whatever shithole country you're in from deciding they don't want to be a "road" company anymore, they want to be a monorail company. Thus all their roads are now monorails and only their trams can travel on their roads. They'll be cool and make a bunch of carrier vehicles for non-monorails though but you have to pay exorbitant fees to get your car on one. Because they're the only people allowed to build anything in their region, no one can just build more roads.

This is as simply as it can be broken down and if you still don't understand just accept the fact you're mentally retarded.

Bets on when they go for Nintendo?

That's bad news if you watch nothing but capeshit and garbage

They literally can't. Microsoft offered to make a deal with them and offered 25 Billion and they said "fuck off".

Mario is immune to the mouse because this motherfucker will sick the Yakuza on those jewish bastards if they try anything.

>which has never made a single good original series or film
Let me just consult the neckbeard guide of """objective""" quality when I'm trying to decide whether or not I liked a film.