These are all supposed to be three different characters

>These are all supposed to be three different characters
What the fuck

Other urls found in this thread:

johnkstuff.blogspot.com/2007/04/cal-arts-1-apology-to-students.html
drive.google.com/file/d/1Q7kBwV9MZdGY820AVo17AYh9mncqcCH2/view
youtube.com/watch?v=qPNa9KD4Y_k
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

Keep furry out of Sup Forums.

I think the middle one is supposed to be the right one's mom

How and Why did this even get greenlit? Who in their right mind would think people would want to watch this?

How did this get greenlit?

If someone came up to you and said that they they’re favorite director was Snyder because his movies looked cool, what would your immediate thought be?

How did this get greenlit?

Animation industry isn't about skill/talent anymore, it's just about who you know and what useless school you got shitted out of.

Today I will remind them

stop being racist

Post the image of Roger Rabbit on the page after that one.

That's all I got

While this show looks awful, this has to be the dumbest criticism I’ve ever seen. Do you know how many cartoons do this exact same thing?

Well I’m glad you’re such an expert
I’m sure a lot of thought goes into choosing what cartoons get greenlit, but on the subject of skill/talent, visuals are a highly superficial thing in storytelling. There are good cartoons that also look amazing, but CN is trying to run a business. They can’t spend a fuckton of money getting Koreans to turn someone’s idea into a masterpiece, and if you had to choose between shit animation and shit plot, the choice is obvious, frankly

I'm more insulted that those animals look so off that the show has to remind the viewers in dialogs what we are supposed to see.
Art is about intent, what sort of artist draw an animal with out the intent of peope recognizing that animal?

Are you trying to imply any show on CN right now has good writing?

It's really a matter of they can't write for shit so they might as well make it nice to look at, but they have trouble on both ends.

So you never read the book, you're just parroting shit because you think it makes you look intelligent.

>what sort of artist draw an animal with out the intent of peope recognizing that animal?
Furries.

>animation is so terrible, look at the work made by these students in a completely different degree course that's been intellectually bankrupt since before the animation industry came into being
Fuck off, animators are practically the only art students who even bother studying anatomy and taking life drawing and they're usually far, far, FAR better at it than the kids in other courses.

Both? Because that’s what this is. A blatant case of shit animation and shit Plot. They had Relationshit in the first fucking episode for fucks sake, before we even knew the characters.

Are you getting me confused with someone else? Or do you not understand what parroting means?

Tell us which cartoons. Take your time.

>Fuck off, animators are practically the only art students who even bother studying anatomy and taking life drawing and they're usually far, far

In the west? Absolutely not.

Absolutely yes:
johnkstuff.blogspot.com/2007/04/cal-arts-1-apology-to-students.html

Here come the asspained art majors.

Don't worry guys, I respect your work when it's actually done well. It's just that most western cartoons can't really do that.

You're posting one page from the Animators' Survival Kit while admitting you never read it, you're parroting it with no new insight. You just saw the page posted somewhere and added the artworks to it.

I....don't believe you.

I know I should and I know its probably true but I still don't believe you.

That they have patrician taste

It's not dumb criticism if you have three characters that are basically fucking clones, with no physical attributes to differentiate them except their voices. The characters in the OP suffer from sameface syndrome and it looks fucking lazy, none other the fact that their supposed to be fucking hedgehogs.

>Are you trying to imply any show on CN right now has good writing?
That’s a matter of subjectivity, but all I’m saying is a well written show with bad animation is a good cartoon, and a welll animated show with poor writing is a bad cartoon. You can complain all day if you think a cartoon is written by monkeys, but when I see people on this board attack a cartoon because of its visuals, it sounds like someone attacking a movie because it didn’t have enough explosions in it, or something. Home movies isn’t animated well. ATHF isnt animated well. There are plenty of cartoons that are written very well, so people love them regardless of how they look.

If the pilot is anything to go by Summer Camp Island is an Adventure Time ripoff aimed for a younger audience, which is most likely exactly what CN wants but won't admit that it does.

>drive.google.com/file/d/1Q7kBwV9MZdGY820AVo17AYh9mncqcCH2/view
Enjoy your trip to hell.
Also pic related is supposed to be a badger.

That’s a completely valid criticism, but OP didnt make that criticism, he instead chose to complain about the background characters
Funny

So what's your point? If it's wrong then you could be able to point that out, attacking the person posting it is a fallacy.

>johnkstuff.blogspot.com/2007/04/cal-arts-1-apology-to-students.html
I em SO archiving this

>That’s a matter of subjectivity

Why do subjectivityfags even come to Sup Forums? If you don't want to discuss this shit critical then fuck off

It's that his nose?

Fucking Christ. Wasn't this ran at Sundance? Like, multiple times?

Yes

Come on, man, did you even read my post? I didn’t want to talk about the show itself, I was arguing that visuals are a superficial thing to complain about in cartoons

hyup

Thought it was another hedgehog.

>It was first announced in January 2017 and later had been shopped around at different festivals including Sundance.
Seems so. Were you there?

>visuals are a superficial thing to complain about in cartoons

Cartoons are a visual medium, the entire point of watching a cartoon over reading a book is the visuals.
They are EQUALLY important, 50/50

But like I was saying, there are good cartoons that look bad and bad cartoons that look good. It doesn’t matter. It doesn’t have any effect on the overall quality on the cartoon. If Sup Forums hates bad looking animation, they should take their fucking asses to Sup Forums

>"oh good, i'm talking to a real person with actual opinions instead of an internet memelord who has to research his position on anything before speaking for fear of being "wrong" in his reddit and memey circles"

>If Sup Forums hates bad looking animation, they should take their fucking asses to Sup Forums

Fucking wow lad.
Are you literally the artist for this cartoon? That's the only way I could make sense of this thought process

one of the greatest shows to ever grace the world with its existence

Nope. Judging by the fact that it was even nominated for anything, much less won awards, makes me pretty sure I wouldn't want to be there either.

While there are outliers, I think you'll find that most bad cartoons look like shit

question, does "look like shit" include every single thing to not strive for realism, or not have a proper Hollywood budget?

I’m amazed that Sup Forums has officially performed enough mental gymnastics to defend people who like Snyder movies
I disagree

What is bad about liking fun movies?

How bad 12 oz Mouse looks is a part of the joke. The joke is the assumption that Williams Street could, should do better.

That joke isn't made with modern noodleshit. The people making noodleshit *can't* do better.

>fun
there's that word again

No. ATHF is low budget af but they still had a great style
I said most not all. Do you think most good cartoons look shittier?

The artist is a fucking hack with shit comedy and ugly as sin designs. Irs proof CN is fucked in the head and the execs and everyone involved in this shit and craig of the creek need to be fucking sacked

Let me guess...the creator is trans or a girl, right?

your Tumblr is showing

But the plot is fucking shit

I think one of the head crew members is an animator/writer on Adventure Time too, so I guess it could be argued that they got shit quality through via internal connections.

You know what? You’re right, I’m sorry. I suppose everyone goes into movies looking for something different. I like movies with well written, compelling stories, but I understand if someone watches movies for other reasons. That would be like getting on someone for not watching porn with plot.

I know I sounded sarcastic but I really wasn’t being
>I said most not all. Do you think most good cartoons look shittier?
I prefer newer cartoons to older ones and I think newer cartoons tend to look worse than older ones

go home Hitler, you are drunk

The entire show is going to be shipping drama with ugly fucking animals. Its already fucking garbage

Off-Model Thread?

>animation has only gotten faster, cheaper, and more efficient over the years.
>storytelling, voice acting, and overall quality has only declined.

>hurr durr a visual medium can look like the fucking diarrhea in OPs pic
>anyone who disagrees with me needs to go to Sup Forums
Kill yourself faggot. Shows like ATHF use bad animation to further the humor, this is just fucking cheap and lazy.

This literally has nothing to do with off-model, but OP's picture suffering from sameface.

The middle one is one of their mom, it makes sense she looks similar (i don't know which one though, i can't tell those two apart)

You don’t know that, and drama is good
>storytelling, voice acting, and overall quality has only declined.
wew

I actually prefer the style of shows like Dexter's Lab, Grim Adventures, My Life as a Robot, Invader ZIM, Adventure Time, or OK K.O. to stuff like 80s action cartoons or even the Disney Renaissance
Detailed character designs were always a turn-off for me ever since I was a child.

those are surprisingly consistent

>implying ATHF wasn’t cheap and lazy
I agree

>I prefer newer cartoons to older ones and I think newer cartoons tend to look worse than older ones
>liking unfunny cancer like summer camp island just because its new
You are the epitome of an underage hipster with no taste. Plz consider suicide

We don't even know if that's supposed to be her mom you racist

Summer Camp Island might get cancel.

>it's a Sup Forums complains thread

Hmm odd choice user. Most people who prefer older style usually prefer the older cartoons right along with it.

I'm just here cause the fan art and the shitposts are better than the actual show

Because Scooby-Doo Where Are You had such intricate writing

Ah shit, meant to reply

>You don’t know that, and drama is good
No its not you fucking shipping autist, and ive seen the pilot and its fucking awful. You need to be fucking shot for your utterly retarded taste for supporting this shit.
ATHF was actually funny, this shit isnt. Kill yourself

IT'S FUCKING BAUHAUS

BAUHAAAUUUUSSS

If ATHF was cheap and lazy its alright because it must have been made by comic geniuses to turn out so well

>wanting to kill someone over a cartoon
whew

Welcome to Sup Forums

>what is looney tunes and tom and jerry, which predates scooby doo
Faggot

Post more, please.

Welcome to Sup Forums, you newfag peice of shit. Now get out and get back to your safespace where no one can compain about your shit cartoon you love so much.

what is wrong with Bauhaus?
youtube.com/watch?v=qPNa9KD4Y_k

I never said I liked SCI and I never said I liked any cartoon just because it’s new. Please stop putting words in my mouth
I differentiate between animation and writing, and I prefer writing, but my favorite cartoon of all time is the boondocks (specifically season 1) because it was both
ATHF was a good show despite the animation being bad is because no one gave a fuck how it was animated

>safespace
says the guy triggered by people not thinking like him

>Boondocks had good animation
Nigga the show ran at half FPS and spent 90% of the time focused on talking heads.

I can tell the rightmost is a huge faggot. Middle is probably best girl.

at this point, I only got a bit of fanart

Your literally defending it by saying bad animation shouldnt be criticized. And here by saying its shit “drama” was good. Your a fucking idiot if you think your hiding your blatent agenda to defend this godawful show. You are apart of the cancer killing western animation.

>my favorite cartoon of all time is the boondocks
Love it, I guess its new, but the artstyle is just anime with black people, not "nu cartoon" style

The animation of ATHF was cheap but you gotta admit the character design was fucking perfect
>inb4 its just faces on food

>what is looney tunes and tom and jerry
Cinematic animation with a budget reflecting it

I liked 300 tho