1080 is dead

Fury was double Tonga.
Vega is Vega.

>3%
you are actually retarded right?
if it is actually true that after 3 years it is 10-15% faster
then it is an undeniable fact that amd had a card that was 10-15% weaker because amd gimped their drivers
would you call nvidia the savior if they gimped their cards to 90% of the performance and then over the next three years they remove the gimping?

It's a semi-meme due to Kepler not receiving a lot of optimization compared to AMD cards later down the road, though it's mostly because Nvidia actually made new tech and optimized primarily for it, while AMD stuck to rebrandeons and literally made nothing new in the range of the 290 up until Vega.

>while AMD stuck to rebrandeons and literally made nothing new in the range of the 290 up until Vega
>what is Tonga and Polaris
?

Oh yeah I loved the RX490, great card breh.

>there MUST be a halo offering, goy
>buy it goy

I've always thought the FineWine meme was an indictment of AMD as well. It just means they have good hardware but absolutely shit tier drivers that take ages to catch up to Nvidia. What's funny is Sup Forums was trying to convince people that AMD's drivers were as good as Nvidia now, that the no drivers meme was dead, and then they literally go and launch Vega with no drivers. It performs like a fucking overclocked Fury X. AMD's software support is abysmal.

Not bad. Palit is a shit brand but for that price...
Fury was already shit on release.
>600 €+
>Hot and consuming
>Not overclockable
>4 GB VRAM
A 580 can compete with a Fury X, its only 30 % slower.

>if I write "goy" it somehow magically alters the past and we can pretend that AMD actually made any tech in the range of the 290 before Vega

>pcie x16 2.0 @ x16 1.1