>"two speed" Europe
This is what I support too. EU needs to evolve peacefully with a concensus. Two speed Europe enables that giving countries free range on what they want EU to be for them. Let the Eastern Europe enjoy gibs and hating on foreigners while more federalist minded countries can integrate. Everyone wins.
I get your point.
The thing is, I believe the Muslim narrative is overplayed in Poland and has been completely deformed.
The reality is that millions of people did get in the EU seeking political asylum, fleeing the barbaric Islamic State. These overflowed the costs of Greece and Italy mainly. While Italy did try to control things a bit, Greece was much too happy to fuck with the rest of the EU and literally put up his lines to bring everybody straight to the northern border without any control.
Obviously there were also a bunch of economic migrants that wanted to get in too. And because there wasn't any control they could go through.
Germany threw its guilt trip and opened the gates, bringing even more pressure.
It is exactly because there is no political Union and every country can do what it want that all this crisis happened
An orderly coordinated response from the whole EU to separate people seeking jobs and welfare from real refugees in need of humanitarian help would have been a success and avoided all the disaster.
There is no Marxist Jew in brussel trying to lower the purity of Poland by forxing it to accept bilions of salafist terrorists.
Some countries needed help to deal temporarily with the crisis and it seemed little to ask after all the solidarity.
Just my humble opinion from an outside perspective.
I do believe that Poland is in the right regarding Russia and that Germany is playing a dangerous game though.
don't nitpick you nigger
you know what I mean
Could anyone show me which article of the EU treaties provides that every country that gets EU funds is obliged to take and feed black refugees from third world countries?
It was the Americans that literally created the EU
Washington has always been aggressively pro-European
I don't really understand. I legal body that doesn't possess legislative initiative doesn't make any laws because that's the fucking definition of legislative initiative.
I understand Poland's qualms to an extent, being that I'm from one of the countries that had to be under troika and felt how tight the EU can squeeze you.
But consider the following: if this country wasn't affiliated to the EU, what moral imperative would EU countries have to support it's development, more than they would have to any other nation-state? And why would they be obligated to support any nation-state they felt was betraying their values?
Both EU ascension and EU exit are decisions by the national governments. National governments are subsidized by the EU, under the presumption of the generality of governments that make up the EU that each government will conform to the general consensus and the Copenhagen criteria. Poland wouldn't have entered the EU if the EU thought it would've start walking back on it's compromises. It's why Turkey was pushed back from ascension.
Only if it has significant sway over it like it used to, I want a Europe without that sway.
>The reality is that millions of people did get in the EU seeking political asylum, fleeing the barbaric Islamic State. These overflowed the costs of Greece and Italy mainly.
What do the US guards do when they see a horde of illegal immigrants from Mexico trying to cross the border:
1. welcome them with flowers
2. shoot to them
You still wonder why Poland prefers to maintain political ties with the USA more than with Germany?
federalization is a pipe dream
prepare for the asian century